An Examination of Questionnaire Evaluation by Expert Reviewers
By Kristen Olson. 2010
223 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9489a43c6dcdfa8c2ef6c27fca8f77bcf589c8f5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Evelina Gulbovaitė
- Jolita Vveinhardt
- Jaime Teevan
- Paul N. Bennett
- Eric Horvitz
- Saleema Amershi
- Shamsi T. Iqbal
- William R. Hersh
In Statistics and Probability
- Evelina Gulbovaitė
- Jolita Vveinhardt
- Jaime Teevan
- Paul N. Bennett
- Eric Horvitz
- Saleema Amershi
- Daniel S. Weld
Citations in the corpus
- Expert Evaluation of Diagnostic Instrument for Personal and Organizational Value Congruence (2016, methodology): “Olson (2010) provided empirical evidence that experts are able to discern questions that manifest data quality problems, even if individual experts vary in what they rate as being problematic.”
- Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction (2019, background): “Expert reviews have been shown to be efective at identifying problems related to wording and clarity [27, 34, 43].”