Targeting plug-in hybrid electric vehicle policies to increase social benefits

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Modelling electric vehicle usage intentions: an empirical study in Malaysia (2015, background): “A differentiated subsidy scheme was suggested as part of the public policy in the United States (US) in order to increase the penetration of EVs (Skerlos and Winebrake, 2010).”
An agent-based model to study market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (2011, background): “Skerlos and Winebrake (2010) examined the impact of tax credits for PHEV purchase, which were introduced in 2009 by the U.S. government and are available to all consumers equally in all parts of the country.”
The government regulation and market behavior of the new energy automotive industry (2019, background): “Skerlos and Winebrake (2010) claim in their research that when consumers buy vehicles in certain subsidized areas, higher social welfare will be generated.”
China’s electric vehicle subsidy scheme: Rationale and impacts (2014, unknown): “Skerlos and Winebrake (2010) argued that a consumer income and location of purchase specific subsidy policy would yield higher social benefits.”
Effectiveness of incentives on electric vehicle adoption in Norway (2016, background): “As with other technologies that provide environmental benefits, governments have used various policy mechanisms to encourage BEV adoption (Michalek et al., 2012; Skerlos and Winebrake, 2010).”