Triune ethics: The neurobiological roots of our multiple moralities
By D. Narvaez. 2008
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2062422c71359fa5326a5227ae9ffbe3713eeb9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Karl Aquino
- Ruodan Shao
- S. Hannah
- Dan Freeman
- Marie S. Mitchell
- P. L. Jennings
- Carol Frogley Ellertson
- Marc-Charles Ingerson
In Information Systems and Management
- S. Hannah
- Karl Aquino
- Ruodan Shao
- Dan Freeman
- Marie S. Mitchell
- P. L. Jennings
- Carol Frogley Ellertson
- Marc-Charles Ingerson
In Social Psychology
- S. Hannah
- Marie S. Mitchell
- P. L. Jennings
- Ruodan Shao
- Dan Freeman
- Carol Frogley Ellertson
- Marc-Charles Ingerson
- K. DeTienne
Citations in the corpus
- Moral Development in Business Ethics: An Examination and Critique (2019, background): “Narvaez (2008a) also believes that Haidt over-credits flashes of affect and intuition and undervalues reasoning.”
- Beyond Moral Reasoning: A Review of Moral Identity Research and Its Implications for Business Ethics (2008, background): “constitutes the practice of "everyday morality" may be tacit, automatic, and driven by moral heuristics rather than calculative reasoning (Lapsley & Narvaez, 2004; Narvaez & Lapsley, 2005; Narvaez, 2008).”
- The moral self: A review and integration of the literature (2015, background): “For example, Narvaez (2008) provided what she calls a “triune ethics theory” of the moral self that builds on a social-cognitive view of the moral self and incorporates insights from personality and evolutionary psychology, as well as from neuroscience.”