The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization?

By Torben Iversen, Thomas R. Cusack. World Politics, 2000

781 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1f9cc6ccde92e6a96e565e2eba2e6fc6901114d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Dualization, crisis and the welfare state (2014, background): “See, for example, Iversen and Cusack (2000). Dualization, crisis and the welfare state 389”
The Diversity Of Modern Capitalism (2003, methodology): “The structural reasons behind the growth in expenditures are varied: the ageing of the population increases the pensions burden, particularly in Pay As You Go (PAYG) systems; the growth slowdown and de-industrialization (Iversen and Cusack 2000) increased unemployment and hence the amount of related”
Social democrats and the new partisan politics of public investment in education (2009, positive): “The preferred statistical method for testing this kind of hypothesis is an error-correction model (ECM) (Beck 1991; Iversen and Cusack 2000; Kaufman and Segura-Ubiergo 2001).”
Determinants of public education spending in 21 OECD democracies, 1980–2001 (2007, background): “…of path dependence (Pierson 2001, 2004), it is not surprising that the current partisan composition of the government loses much of its explanatory power (Kittel and Obinger 2003), for which economic internationalization might not be the sole or even most important reason (Iversen and Cusack 2000).”
From the Ballot to the Blackboard: The Redistributive Political Economy of Education (2010, background): “Others see ‘globalization’ as an impotent foe, with governments still able to conduct policies according to their own partisan preferences (Garrett, 1998) and citizens’ wages largely unaffected by changes in openness to the global economy (Krugman, 2000; Iversen and Cusack, 2000).”
Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production (2002, neutral): “In contrast, Iversen and Cusack (2000) contend that there is no convincing evidence that international trade increases economic insecurity.”
"The Dynamics of Welfare State Expansion: Trade Openness, Deindustrialization and Partisan Politics" (2001, methodology): “A more detailed analysis of the causes of deindustrialization, based on time series data, shows that the phenomenon is largely explained by a combination of rapid productivity growth in agriculture and manufacturing combined with a shift in demand away from manufactured goods towards services (see I”
Globalization, labour power and partisan politics revisited (2010, methodology): “Finally, we control for de-industrialization, which Iversen and Cusack (2000) treat as the primary source of economic insecurity in OECD countries in the last quarter of the twentieth century.”
Economic Globalization and the Welfare State in Affluent Democracies, 1975–2001 (2005, background): “Consistent with Iversen and Cusack (2000), deindustrialization triggers welfare state expansion.”