Economic Globalization and the Welfare State in Affluent Democracies, 1975–2001

261 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Consequences of Economic Globalization for Affluent Democracies (2007, background): “Figure 1 displays these trends in terms of trade openness (exports + imports as a percent of GDP) and what we term total globalization (trade openness + inward and outward direct and portfolio investment as a percent of GDP) (Brady et al. 2005) for 19 affluent democracies (IMF 2006).1 1Of course, th”
Learning From Others (2009, background): “…are exceptions, and the literature is still predominantly concentrated on the issues of retrenchment, the role of globalization, and the old vs. new politics of the welfare state (for example, Pierson 2001b; Korpi and Palme 2003; Allan and Scruggs 2004; Brady, Beckfield, and Seeleib-Kaiser 2005).”
Does Immigration Undermine Public Support for Social Policy? (2014, background): “Moreover, they and others show that immigration has no effect on the size and generosity of the welfare state (Brady, Beckfield, and Seeleib-Kaiser 2005; Brady and Lee forthcoming; Taylor-Gooby 2005).”
Does economic globalisation affect income inequality? A meta‐analysis (2020, background): “Brady et al. (2005) conceptualise economic globalisation as ‘the intensification of international economic exchange and the label for the contemporary era of international economic integration.”