Physical Unclonable Functions and Applications: A Tutorial

By Charles Herder, Meng-Day (Mandel) Yu, Farinaz Koushanfar, Srini Devadas. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2014

1,143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hardware and Architecture

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1da194a3f03d7d7216b03ee5ff408d6e070f4b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

1. Daniele Ielmini
2. Said F. Al-Sarawi
3. Derek Abbott
4. H. Philip Wong
5. Prosanta Gope
6. An Chen
7. Yansong Gao
8. Biplab Kumar Sikdar

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Daniele Ielmini
2. H. Philip Wong
3. Said F. Al-Sarawi
4. Derek Abbott
5. Prosanta Gope
6. An Chen
7. Yansong Gao
8. Biplab Kumar Sikdar

In Hardware and Architecture

1. Said F. Al-Sarawi
2. Derek Abbott
3. Daniele Ielmini
4. H. Philip Wong
5. Prosanta Gope
6. An Chen
7. Yansong Gao
8. Biplab Kumar Sikdar

Citations in the corpus

• In-memory computing with resistive switching devices (2018, background): “The PUF provides a response to an external challenge and the function generating the response cannot be captured or cloned, thus preventing chip counterfeiting and hacking 77 .”
• Physical unclonable functions (2020, methodology): “To avoid replay-based attacks, each CRP is used only once 10,11 .”
• Lightweight and Privacy-Preserving Two-Factor Authentication Scheme for IoT Devices (2019, background): “recreated [19], the proposed scheme can be considered safe against cloning attack.”
• A review of emerging non-volatile memory (NVM) technologies and applications (2016, methodology): “PUF utilizes the physical randomness to generate unclonable instance-specific security features and can be used as ‘‘fingerprint” to identify or authenticate specific hardwares [130].”