Biofortification, biodiversity and diet: A search for complementary applications against poverty and malnutrition
By T. Johns, P. Eyzaguirre. 2007
175 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Food Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1abc76ca7c5f17ec6cb1d27a39217eac99a29d3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Food Science
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- Three perspectives on sustainable food security: efficiency, demand restraint, food system transformation. What role for life cycle assessment? (2014, background): “While theymay have a part to play, these techniques must be situated within a broader food-based approach that emphasises greater nutritional and agricultural diversity within the production system (Johns and Eyzaguirre, 2007).”
- A meta-analysis of community-based studies on quality protein maize (2010, background): “, 2007), more sustainable than nutrient supplementation (Bouis, 1999), and a viable complementary strategy to food fortification, which relies on central processing of food and therefore may be less accessible, particularly to the rural poor (Bouis, 1999; Horton, 2006; Johns and Eyzaguirre, 2007).”
- Managing the Nutrition of Plants and People (2012, unknown): “In principle, two complementary strategies can be employed to increase mineral concentrations in edible crops [11, 12, 14, 15, 27, 116–119].”
- Food security and sustainable intensification (2014, background): “It is argued that relatively simple nutritional manipulations cannot adequately substitute for a rich and varied diet that can best meet the complexities of human food requirements [55].”