A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97

By Elizabeth Mitchell, Frank Sullivan. British medical journal, 2001

320 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Health Information Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a192b3c87d0f960cdf4092f2cc340938165d1575

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In General Health Professions

In Health Information Management

Citations in the corpus

AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment (2008, result): “This is similar to earlier concerns about the PC on the doctor’s desktop, but which actually increased rather than decreased patient satisfaction (Mitchell & Sullivan 2001; Hsu et al. 2005).”
Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. (2006, background): “Within the context of health care delivery, one manifestation of the information revolution is the increasingly commonplace use of the electronic medical record (EMR) [20].”
Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care (2006, unknown): “However, they have been limited to specific systems, such as computerized provider order entry (96); capabilities, such as computerized reminders (97, 98); or clinical specialty (99).”
Improving Recognition of Drug Interactions: Benefits and Barriers to Using Automated Drug Alerts (2002, background): “We developed a 67-item survey (19 questions) that included the following: (1) clinicians’ computer use for patient-related activities; (2) recognition of common drug-drug and drug-condition interactions; and (3) clinicians perceptions about and experiences with automated drug alerts.”
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. (2005, methodology): “Supplementary methods of finding studies included a review of article reference lists, articles citing included studies as listed in the Science Citation Index, PubMed related articles feature, informatics conference proceedings, information provided by primary study authors, and other recent review”
PRISM framework: a paradigm shift for designing, strengthening and evaluating routine health information systems (2009, background): “Another problem in strengthening information systems was the scarcity of structured evaluations for best practices in information systems (Mitchell and Sullivan 2001; Tomasi et al .”