Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care

By B. Chaudhry, Jerome Wang, Shinyi Wu, M. Maglione, W. Mojica, E. Roth, S. Morton, Paul Shekelle. 2006

3,373 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Health Information Management

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Health Information Management

Citations in the corpus

RETAIN: An Interpretable Predictive Model for Healthcare using Reverse Time Attention Mechanism (2016, background): “Several systematic reviews have underlined the care quality improvement using predictive analysis [7, 22, 5, 18].”
Interval Coded Scoring: a toolbox for interpretable scoring systems (2018, background): “Several studies have shown that such systems indeed increase practitioner performance and improve patient outcome, while decreasing the costs at the same time (Johnston et al., 1994; Garg et al., 2005; Chaudhry et al., 2006).”
Knowledge translation of research findings (2012, background): “The m ajority of early studies on computerized reminders were undertaken in highly computerized US academic health science centres, and their generalisability to other settings i s le s certain [51].”
Electronic Patient Portals: Evidence on Health Outcomes, Satisfaction, Efficiency, and Attitudes (2013, neutral): “…their records through a patient portal and if the study design was “descriptive, qualitative”; “descriptive, quantitative”; or “hypothesis testing” (including randomized, controlled trials [RCTs]) or if they were systematic reviews, following classiﬁcations ﬁrst used by Chaudhry and colleagues (3).”
Relationship Between Clerical Burden and Characteristics of the Electronic Environment With Physician Burnout and Professional Satisfaction. (2016, background): “n July 2016 promise for enhancing coordination of care, reducing errors, and improving quality of care.(10-16) In their current form and implementation, however, they seem to have had a variety of unintended negative consequences that reduce efficiency, increase clerical burden, and increase the ris”
Evolving Work Routines: Adaptive Routinization of Information Technology in Healthcare (2011, background): “To date, most studies on HIT focus on inhouse developed systems in leading institutes, and there has been a notable lack of research on the implementation of commercially developed HIT (Chaudhry et al. 2006).”
Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study. (2009, background): “Benefits have emerged.(2,3) However, studiesexaminingthe”
Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. (2007, neutral): “Patient or family counseling 92 (92-97)19,26,33 91 (90-92)19,33”
Impact of Trust and Privacy Concerns on Technology Acceptance in Healthcare: An Indian Perspective (2020, neutral): “Researchers have studied impact of information technology on quality, e ﬃ ciency and cost of healthcare services [20].”