Investigative Interviewers' Perceptions of Their Difficulty in Adhering to Open-Ended Questions with Child Witnesses

By R. Wright, Martine B. Powell. 2006

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Best practice guidelines for conducting investigative interviews of children emphasise the importance of obtaining free narrative accounts with the use of open-ended questions. However, research indicates that most investigative interviewers underutilise open-ended questions, even following intensive training in their use. The aim of the current study was to explore investigative interviewers' perceptions of their difficulty in asking open-ended questions. During a training course on how to use open-ended questions, eight child abuse investigators were individually interviewed about why they had asked specific questions in a 10-minute mock interview conducted immediately earlier with a school child. Overall, three reasons were identified. These related to: 1. the specificity of the information required from children; 2. the unfamiliar nature of the open-ended discourse style; and 3. the complex distinction between open-ended versus specific questions. Each of these themes is discussed, along with the implications for trainers and researchers in child investigative interviewing.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a10f115b976f4b3c4e41f2f3d8554abe5462f131

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Mairi Benson
  2. Martine B. Powell
  3. Alexander Buijsrogge
  4. Wouter Duyck
  5. Nicolas Roulin
  6. Eva Derous

In General Health Professions

  1. Mairi Benson
  2. Martine B. Powell
  3. Belinda Guadagno
  4. R. Wright

In Social Psychology

  1. Mairi Benson
  2. Martine B. Powell
  3. Nicolas Roulin
  4. Eva Derous

Citations in the corpus