Nascent entrepreneurship: empirical studies and developments

By Per Davidsson. 2005

416 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a086cc4036d8b8b0870568cfe3ea664bfbd32b97

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Roy Thurik
2. J. Hessels
3. Isabel Grilo
4. I. Verheul
5. Peter van der Zwan
6. N. Bosma
7. Rolf Sternberg
8. M. van Gelderen

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Roy Thurik
2. J. Hessels
3. N. Bosma
4. Peter van der Zwan
5. I. Verheul
6. Rolf Sternberg
7. David B. Audretsch
8. Isabel Grilo

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Roy Thurik
2. J. Hessels
3. N. Bosma
4. Peter van der Zwan
5. Rolf Sternberg
6. I. Verheul
7. Isabel Grilo
8. David B. Audretsch

Citations in the corpus

• The Influence of Big Five Personality Traits and Self-efficacy on Entrepreneurial Intention: The Role of Gender (2017, background): “Other studies observe that the number of men involved in starting businesses is significantly larger than women (Davidsson, 2006).”
• Drivers of entrepreneurial aspirations at the country level: the role of start-up motivations and social security (2007, background): “It should be noted, however, that research on nascent entrepreneurship indicates that some startups have high aspirations because of over-optimism or incompetence, while others have modest aspirations which however often are based on more realistic perceptions (Davidsson 2006).”
• From resource base to dynamic capabilities: An investigation of new firms (2009, neutral): “An important reason for this is that founders with greater human capital may apply a higher threshold for what is deemed satisfactory performance and thus exit or start multiple ventures in response, creating a confounding effect (Davidsson, 2006; Gimeno, Folta, Cooper, and Woo, 1997).”
• Determinants of entrepreneurial engagement levels in Europe and the US (2008, background): “Risk tolerance – as could be expected - is found to increase the probability of being self-employed.23 Davidsson (2006) refers to the ‘fear of failure’ variable which influences the propensity to become nascent in the obvious fashion.”
• Nonlinear Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Small Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Resource Orchestration Capabilities (2013, background): “Second, by sampling high-technology firms, we increased the likelihood of identifying some firms within our sample that were able to achieve high levels of growth, which is sometimes more difficult for small firms (Davidsson, 2005).”
• Nascent Entrepreneurs and Venture Emergence: Opportunity Confidence, Human Capital, and Early Planning (2010, methodology): “The PSED is a detailed longitudinal survey of 830 nascent entrepreneurs identified while in the process of starting new businesses and has been used in a number of other studies (see Davidsson, 2006; Reynolds and Curtin, 2008, for comprehensive reviews).”
• Entrepreneurial intention in the time of crisis: a field study (2016, background): “As suggested by a large portion of the literature (Davidsson 2006; Lans et al., 2010; Sandhu et al. 2011; Zhao et al., 2005), male students are, on average, more oriented toward entrepreneurship and perceive a higher likelihood of starting a new venture than female students.”
• Entrepreneurship as an Urban Event? Empirical Evidence from European Cities (2014, background): “There are, however, a number of partial theories that were not created for entrepreneurship research, but which were later adapted for this purpose (DAVIDSSON, 2006).”
• The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study (2014, background): “Left-censoring is a frequent problem in entrepreneurial research, and efforts to solve the problem have involved large-scale population studies (Davidsson, 2006; Reynolds, 2006).”