THE COSTS OF APPREHENSIVE FORAGING

By Z. Abramsky, M. Rosenzweig, A. Subach. 2002

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a07b574989777e9046df0848bfe4543aacac3a40

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. S. Creel
2. John A. Winnie
3. E. Gese
4. T. Atwood
5. Jon E. Swenson
6. M. Delibes
7. D. Kelt
8. D. Christianson

Citations in the corpus

• Coyotes and recolonizing wolves: social rank mediates risk-conditional behaviour at ungulate carcasses (2008, background): “Evidence suggests that general threat-alleviating behaviours, including increased vigilance (Lima 1987a), reduced foraging time (Hughes & Ward 1993; Abramsky et al. 2002), changes in group size or configuration (Creel & Winnie 2005), preemptive aggression (Bertram 1978; Gese 1999) and retreat to…”
• Sex-specific behavioural responses of elk to spatial and temporal variation in the threat of wolf predation (2007, background): “Individuals may increase vigilance in response to elevated threat, and as with habitat shifts, this response often carries a foraging cost, typically paid with a reduction in foraging time (Jennings & Evans 1980; Underwood 1982; Berger & Cunningham 1988; Lima 1998; Abramsky et al. 2002).”
• Responses of elk herd size to fine-scale spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves (2005, unknown): “Many studies have shown that antipredator behaviour is sensitive to distance from cover, although few studies have tested whether distance to cover affects natural variation in predation risk (Elgar 1989; Lazarus & Symonds 1992; Hughes & Ward 1993; Kunkel & Pletscher 2000; Barta et al. 2004).”
• Do bears know they are being hunted (2012, background): “…that the costs of Nonlethal, behavioral effects of predation risk, also called indirect, trait-mediated, or nonconsumptive effects, include temporal and spatial changes in activity patterns, increased vigilance, and reduced foraging time for prey species (e.g. Lima, 1998; Abramsky et al., 2002).”
• Comparative ecology of desert small mammals: a selective review of the past 30 years (2011, methodology): “Abramsky et al. (2002) suggested that the estimate of Kotler and Blaustein (1995) Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article-abstract/92/6/1158/957842 by guest on 29 July 2018 for the cost of predation might be too large but that differences in estimates likely reflect different…”