Do bears know they are being hunted

By A. Ordiz, O. Støen, Solve Sæbø, J. Kindberg, M. Delibes, Jon E. Swenson. 2012

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1b0489fe64bd1b7973ccaa160c322b875432007

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Jon E. Swenson
2. O. Støen
3. Solve Sæbø
4. A. Ordiz
5. A. Zedrosser
6. J. Kindberg
7. Miha Krofel
8. Euan G. Ritchie

In Small Animals

1. A. Zedrosser
2. O. Støen
3. Solve Sæbø
4. K. Jerina
5. J. Kindberg
6. A. Ordiz
7. J. López‐Bao
8. Christopher N. Johnson

Citations in the corpus

• Shared resources between giant panda and sympatric wild and domestic mammals (2015, background): “For example, the start of hunting seasons (Ordiz et al., 2012) and direct encounters (Ordiz et al.”
• Seasonality and human disturbance alter brown bear activity patterns: implications for circumpolar carnivore conservation? (2017, background): “…patterns to different levels of human disturbance across study areas during summer–fall, because bears avoid humans and become more nocturnal after hunting seasons start (Ordiz et al., 2012), after encountering people (Ordiz et al., 2013), and where road density is higher (Ordiz et al., 2014).”
• Effects of predator control on behaviour of an apex predator and indirect consequences for mesopredator suppression (2012, background): “Larger predators are not immune: their activity patterns can be influenced by the risk of encounter with humans (Theuerkauf 2009), particularly when facing persecution (Ordiz et al. 2012).”
• Consequences of brown bear viewing tourism : A review (2017, background): “292 Because human presence and human activities affect daily activity patterns of bears 293 (e.g., Ordiz et al., 2012, 2013, 2014) and also act as a stressor (Støen et al., 2015), bear 294 viewing with or without feeding sites can add to the existing level of disturbance 295 induced by people in…”
• Lasting behavioural responses of brown bears to experimental encounters with humans (2013, background): “This predator–prey framework can be useful to study how large carnivores (e.g. wolves Canis lupus, brown bears Ursus arctos, lions Panthera leo; Linnaeus 1758) behave in a human-altered environment (Rode, Farley & Robbins 2006; Ordiz et al. 2011, 2012).”
• Evolutionary and ecological traps for brown bears Ursus arctos in human‐modified landscapes (2018, background): “…trap mechanisms After suffering centuries of persecution, bears are likely to perceive human activity as a predation risk that obliges them to increase their vigilance instead of foraging, e.g. during the hunting season and the times of day when humans are in the forest (Ordiz et al. 2011, 2012).”
• Don't poke the bear: using tracking data to quantify behavioural syndromes in elusive wildlife (2019, background): “Accordingly, we observed a population level behavioural shift towards shorter daily movement distances and shorter displacement in response to the onset of the berry season which was expected given that bears engage in more arearestricted search behaviour when foraging on berries (Ordiz et al., 2012”
• Effects of habituation, research and ecotourism on faecal glucocorticoid metabolites in wild western lowland gorillas: Implications for conservation management (2014, background): “Thirdly, like brown bears during the hunting season (Ordiz et al., 2012), gorillas under habituation detect humans before contact is made and adjust their movements accordingly (Blom et al., 2004; Cipolletta, 2003).”