Temporal discounting and environmental risks: The role of ethical and loss-related concerns

By L. Hendrickx, S. Nicolaij. 2004

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0655b7835e93bdcd842fd01773a19c85de444b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. L. Steg
2. L. Hendrickx
3. Alexander Gattig
4. Hanspeter Pfister
5. Gisela Böhm
6. Siegwart Lindenberg

In General Decision Sciences

1. L. Steg
2. L. Hendrickx
3. Siegwart Lindenberg
4. Alexander Gattig
5. Hanspeter Pfister
6. Ben R. Newell
7. C. Moore
8. Rachel I. McDonald

In Sociology and Political Science

1. L. Steg
2. L. Hendrickx
3. Hanspeter Pfister
4. Siegwart Lindenberg
5. G. Schuitema
6. C. Moore
7. Katherine V. Kortenkamp
8. Alexander Gattig

Citations in the corpus

• The role of revenue use in the acceptability of transport pricing policies (2008, background): “Hendrickx and Nicolaij (2004) found similar differences in responses between within- and between-subjects designs.”
• Consequences, morality, and time in environmental risk evaluation (2005, background): “This factor structure could be replicated in quite a few studies now (Böhm, 2003; Böhm and Pfister, 2000; Hendrickx and Nicolaij, 2004).”
• Time, Uncertainty, and Individual Differences in Decisions to Cooperate in Resource Dilemmas (2006, background): “10.1177/0146167205284006PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETINKortenkamp, Moore / TIME AND UNCERTAINTY IN RESOURCE DILEMMAS”
• Judgmental Discounting and Environmental Risk Perception: Dimensional Similarities, Domain Differences, and Implications for Sustainability (2007, background): “…(Hausman, 1979; Loewenstein, 1988), medical and health issues (Cairns & Van der Pol, 1997; Christensen-Szalanski, 1984), as well as environmental risks (Böhm & Pfister, 2005; Hendrickx & Nicolaij, 2004) have been used to study how temporal outcome-delay affects people’s judgments and choices.”
• Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’ of climate change: An integrative review (2015, background): “But others, for example B€ohm and Pfister (2005), have only found weak evidence for temporal discounting in (non-climate change-related) environmental risk scenarios (e.g., oil leaking into the sea) (see also Hendrickx & Nicolaij, 2004).”
• Normative, Gain and Hedonic Goal Frames Guiding Environmental Behavior (2007, background): “Similarly, Hendrickx and Nicolaij (2004) found that ethical concerns play a prominent role in the evaluation of environmental risks.”