How Close Are We? Measuring Intimacy and Examining Gender Differences
By M. Hook, Lawrence H. Gerstein, Lacy Detterich, Betty E. Gridley. 2003
229 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, General Health Professions, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a051ee16d50faa9070afcd2f3990ee759b848fa6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Are There Gendered Pathways to Intimacy in Early Adolescents’ and Emerging Adults’ Friendships? (2006, background): “Research on intimacy in romantic relationships has also revealed that feeling loved, cared for, trusted, and understood cannot exist without selfdisclosure (Hook et al., 2003).”
- Emotional intimacy, sexual desire, and sexual satisfaction among partnered heterosexual men (2014, background): “Most definitions of intimacy, however, encompass some of the following dimensions: mutual self-disclosure, personal validation, trust, favorable attitudes, and mutual expression of affection (Baumeister & Bratslavsky, 1999; Hook et al., 2003).”
- I'll keep you in mind: the intimacy function of autobiographical memory (2007, background): “Women, however, also think that being intimate with someone involves personal validation, which refers to sharing interests and understanding another person’s needs (behavioral and communicative indicators of intimacy; Hook et al., 2003).”