Describing Inner Experience? Proponent Meets Skeptic

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015, methodology): “A distinct form of inner experience, not reducible to inner speaking, is inner hearing, which Hurlburt defines as “the experience of hearing something that does not exist” in the individual’s immediate surroundings or external environment (p. 1485).”
Do we need multiple models of auditory verbal hallucinations? Examining the phenomenological fit of cognitive and neurological models. (2010, unknown): “Thirdly, it may be worth considering Hurlburt and Schwitzgebel’s differentiation between inner speech and inner hearing.(54) These authors note that whilst inner speech is experienced as ‘‘going away’’, ‘‘produced by’’, and ‘‘under the control of’’ the individual, and is ‘‘just like speaking aloud e”
Investigating pristine inner experience: implications for experience sampling and questionnaires. (2015, methodology): “As is well known, the term ''experience'' is used in disparate ways (Hurlburt & Schwitzgebel, 2007), sometimes very broad and imprecise (as in ''my college experience,'' which characterizes years of a polyglot of educational, social, financial, partisan , sexual, competitive, enlightening, and…”