Do we need multiple models of auditory verbal hallucinations? Examining the phenomenological fit of cognitive and neurological models.

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015, background): “A further development has been the recognition that AVHs likely take multiple forms (Jones, 2010), with only some forms of the phenomenon being explicable in terms of misattributed inner speech: others may be better understood in terms of a “hypervigilant” attention to external threat (Dodgson &…”
The characteristic features of auditory verbal hallucinations in clinical and nonclinical groups: state-of-the-art overview and future directions. (2012, background): “Furthermore, some patients report what Bleuler ‘‘soundless voices’’ in which a message or meaning is communicated to the voice hearer but it is not actually heard.(4) Loudness varies from whispers to shouting.”
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Auditory Verbal Hallucinations as Atypical Inner Speech Monitoring, and the Potential of Neurostimulation as a Treatment Option (unknown): “Inconsistent neuroimaging findings in relation to the lateralization of AVHs may reflect the varying phenomenology of the experience, and it is likely that not all AVHs can be linked to inner speech (Jones, 2010).”