Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature

By S. Dilley. 2002

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a021656e082cb7034c187c1c028fb25f934999f7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Mark Brown
2. E. Dissanayake
3. Tony Ward

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Mark Brown
2. E. Dissanayake
3. Tony Ward

In Philosophy

1. Mark Brown
2. E. Dissanayake
3. Tony Ward

Citations in the corpus

• Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: Promises and problems. (2002, background): “Arnhart (1998) argues persuasively that ‘‘the good is the desirable . . . human ethics is natural insofar as it satisfies natural human desires’’ (p. 29).”
• Reconstructing the Risk-Need-Responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation (2007, unknown): “This objection states that the RNR model, by virtue of its radical behavioral assumptions, assumes a narrow view of human nature and ignores the fact that as evolved, biologically embodied organisms, humans naturally seek and require certain goods in order to live fulfilling and personally satisfyin”
• The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation (2004, background): “theory (Arnhart, 1998), practical ethics (Murphy, 2001), and philosophical anthropology (Rescher, 1990; Nussbaum, 2000).”
• If music is the food of love, what about survival and reproductive success? (2008, background): “cooperation and the duration and intensity of human parental care (Arnhart, 1998).”