Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: Promises and problems.

By Tony Ward. 2002

423 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54f4fb95ebba11fe93a2d4a56d53b057c7d731f7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. A. Day
2. G. Willis
3. W. L. Marshall
4. Tony Ward
5. Pamela M. Yates
6. G. Serran
7. A. Birgden
8. Mayumi Purvis

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. Day
2. G. Willis
3. W. L. Marshall
4. Pamela M. Yates
5. G. Serran
6. A. Birgden
7. Mayumi Purvis
8. K. Howells

Citations in the corpus

• The role of the therapist in offender treatment (2004, background): “Although the goal of reduced risk is critical, more recently the enhancement of offenders’ functioning has been encouraged (Ward, 2002).”
• The Good Lives Model and the Risk Need Responsivity Model (2012, methodology): “The GLM was developed and advanced by Ward and colleagues (Laws & Ward, 2011; Ward, 2002; Ward & Gannon, 2006; Ward & Maruna, 2007; Ward, Yates, & Long, 2006; Yates, in press; Yates, Prescott, & Ward, 2010) and represents a strengths-based rehabilitation theory that aims to equip clients with intern”
• Therapeutic jurisprudence and responsivity: Finding the will and the way in offender rehabilitation (2004, background): “The GLM determines that obstacles to enhanced well-being may need to be overcome before offending behaviour can be addressed (Ward, 2002; Ward and Stewart, 2003).”
• The Good Lives Model in Practice: Offence Pathways and Case Management (2011, background): “A neglect of one such cluster could lead to either physiological dysfunction, psychological distress leading to mental health problems, or social maladjustment (Ward 2002), all of which will invariably lead to decrease one’s overall life happiness.”
• AFFECT, EMOTIONS AND SEX OFFENDING (2004, background): “In our view, the most convincing evidence for the role of affect as a causal factor in sex offending comes from the offence-process or offence-chain studies pioneered by New Zealand psychologists (Ward et al. , 1995b; Hudson et al ., 1999; Polaschek and Ward, 2002).”
• Good lives, aetiology and the rehabilitation of sex offenders: A bridging theory (2004, background): “Thus, the core idea is that all meaningful human actions reflect attempts to achieve primary human goods (Emmons, 1999; Ward, 2002).”
• Sex offenders, internet child abuse images and emotional avoidance: The importance of values. (2006, background): “Although coming from a very different perspective, such individual operationalisation of values and goals in the context of emotional acceptance would seem to have relevance to the critique by Ward (2002) of current Sex Offender Treatment Programs.”