Partner Selection in Public Goods Experiments

By Giorgio Coricelli, Dietmar Fehr, G. Fellner. 2004

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a00449bc6b2da32d8426ee998ba20e31054c60ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. Christian Thöni
2. Simon Gächter
3. Bruno S. Frey

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Simon Gächter
2. Christian Thöni
3. Ernst Fehr

In Safety Research

1. Christian Thöni
2. Simon Gächter
3. Urs Fischbacher
4. Ananish Chaudhuri
5. Ernst Fehr
6. Armin Falk
7. Jeffrey P. Carpenter
8. Louis Putterman

Citations in the corpus

• Coming and going: Experiments on endogenous group sizes for excludable public goods (2009, unknown): “Several other studies such as Coricelli et al. (2003), Gunthorsdottier et al.”
• Voluntary Association in Public Goods Experiments: Reciprocity, Mimicry and Efficiency (2005, unknown): “public goods game played in groups of two, Coricelli et al. (2004) let subjects bid”
• Social learning and voluntary cooperation among like-minded people (2005, background): “Recent examples comprise Hayashi and Yamagishi (1998), Ehrhart and Keser (1999), Hauk and Nagel (2001), Page, Putterman and Unel (forthcoming), Coricelli, Fehr, and Fellner (2004), and Riedl and Ule (2004).”