Understanding the Influence of Environmental Standards on Judgments and Choices

By Ann E. Tenbrunsel, Kimberly A. Wade-Benzoni, D. Messick, Max H. Bazerman. 2000

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fcc2d4bc6ff9a5251f9e38786bea92a41838a52

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Ann E. Tenbrunsel
2. Max H. Bazerman
3. Alex Coad
4. Kimberly A. Wade-Benzoni
5. P. Haan
6. Kristina A. Diekmann
7. Werner Hölzl
8. Rekha Rao

In Marketing

1. Alex Coad
2. Max H. Bazerman

Citations in the corpus

• The Ethical Mirage: A Temporal Explanation as to Why We Are Not as Ethical as We Think We Are (2010, background): “Tenbrunsel et al. (2000) found that standards influence people’s judgments of proposed environmental solutions, independent of the extent to which those solutions protect the environment.”
• The 1996 Mount Everest climbing disaster: The breakdown of learning in teams (2004, background): “Similarly, the positive effects of goal setting may be lost when a goal is defined too narrowly (Tenbrunsel et al., 2000).”
• Consumer support for environmental policies: An application to purchases of green cars (2009, background): “…number of complex, 5 Similarly, firms may react to mandatory environmental standards by taking a ‘legalistic’ approach, whereby they focus specifically on meeting the standard but they overlook other actions that might have more significant benefits to the environment (Tenbrunsel et al, 2000).”