Female Sex Offenders: An Overview and Analysis of 40 Cases

By Donna M. Vandiver, Jeffery T. Walker. 2002

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assessing female sexual offenders’ motivations and cognitions: an exploratory study (2009, unknown): “2 & 3, February March 2009, 201 216 women (Vandiver & Walker, 2002).”
Not in My Neighborhood (2008, result): “Nonetheless, the low response rate is not unusual; prior survey research with sex offenders reports similarly low response rates, ranging from 2% to 15% (Tewksbury, 2005; Vandiver & Walker, 2002).”
PERCEPTIONS OF SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION: COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES AND COMMUNITY EXPERIENCES (2006, methodology): “Vandiver and Walker (2002) conducted an offender-based examination of 40 registered female offenders in Arkansas.”
Experiences and Attitudes of Registered Female Sex Offenders. (2004, background): “The only assessment to date of female registered sex offenders (Vandiver and Walker, 2002) focused on identifying a typology of offending patterns, including victim and offender characteristics.”
Sexual victimization perpetrated by women: Federal data reveal surprising prevalence (2017, background): “The prevalence of female sexual victimization has long been considered difficult to quantify (Vandiver & Walker, 2002).”
Collateral Consequences of Sex Offender Registration (2005, background): “Looking more directly at offenders on sex offender registries, Vandiver and Walker (2002) examined the demographics, types of offenses, and victim characteristics of registered sex offenders in Arkansas.”