Collateral Consequences of Sex Offender Registration

By R. Tewksbury. 2005

480 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63865b7da30385e74eff039ce7e22d0f11f25cc0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

What People Think About the Management of Sex Offenders in the Community (2008, unknown): “This supports Thomas’s (2005) argument that sex offenders are treated differently from any other group of offenders by governments.”
Public Perceptions About Sex Offenders and Community Protection Policies (2007, background): “…offenders can drain public resources while unnecessarily disrupting the stability of some offenders and diminishing their likelihood of successful reintegration (Kruttschnitt, Uggen, & Shelton, 2000; LaFond, 2005; Levenson & Cotter, 2005; Petersilia, 2003; Tewksbury, 2005; Zevitz et al., 2000b).”
Sex Offender Residence Restrictions: Unintended Consequences and Community Reentry (2007, background): “Indeed, a growing body of research indicates that sex offender registration and community notification can interfere with community reentry and adjustment (Levenson & Cotter, 2005a; Levenson, D’Amora, & Hern, 2007; Sample & Streveler, 2003; Tewksbury, 2004; Tewksbury, 2005; Tewksbury & Lees, 2006; Z”
AN EXAMINATION OF THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION ACT AS APPLIED TO JUVENILES Evaluating the Ability to Predict Sexual Recidivism (2008, background): “…about their effectiveness (Caldwell, 2002; Edwards & Hensley, 2001; Garfinkle, 2003; Letourneau & Miner, 2005; Levenson, 2003; Levenson & Cotter, 2005a, 2005b; McGinnis & Prescott, 2007; Redlich, 2001; Tewksbury, 2002, 2005; Trivits & Reppucci, 2002; Welchans, 2005; Zevitz, 2006; Zimring, 2004).”
Public Awareness and Action Resulting From Sex Offender Community Notification Laws (2008, background): “…on the notion that citizens should be informed of sex offenders’ information and whereabouts, so they may take some preventative action to protect themselves and their children (Caputo & Brodsky, 2003; M. Cohen & Jeglic, 2007; Levenson, 2007; Pawson, 2007; Tewksbury, 2002, 2005; Zevitz, 2006).”
Child Abduction, AMBER Alert, and Crime Control Theater (2008, background): “Schiraldi, & Zeidenberg, 2004; Kovandzic, Sloan, & Vieraitis, 2004; Tewksbury, 2005; Zimring, 2004).”
An integrative theory of desistance from sex offending (2012, background): “Most suffer from a loss of relationships due to their status as a sex offender and/or incarceration or sex offender registration requirements (Tewksbury, 2005).”
Assessing the Impact of Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification On Sex-Offending Trajectories (2010, unknown): “…of family and social relationships, public shaming, and in some instances, violence (Levenson, 2008; Levenson & Cotter, 2005; Levenson, D’Amora, & Hern, 2007; Levenson & Tewksbury, 2009; Mustaine et al., 2006a, 2006b; Tewksbury, 2004, 2005; Tewksbury & Lees, 2006; Tewksbury & Mustaine, 2006, 2007).”
Invisible Stripes? Formerly Incarcerated Persons' Perceptions of Stigma (2012, background): “2004 ) or registered sex offender (Tewksbury 2005 ).”
Where to Find Sex Offenders: An Examination of Residential Locations and Neighborhood Conditions (2006, background): “These negative consequences may include increased collateral consequences, including difficulties securing housing (see Tewksbury, 2004, 2005; Zevitz & Farkas, 2000), isolation, financial and emotional stresses, and decreased residential stability.”
Stigmatization of Sex Offenders (2012, background): “…relationships, employment, housing, and mental health (Levenson 2011; Levenson and Cotter 2005; Levenson et al. 2007; Levenson and Hern 2007; Mercado et al. 2008; Mustaine and Tewksbury 2011, 2006; Mustaine et al. 2006; Tewksbury 2004, 2005; Tewksbury and Lees 2006, 2007; Tewksbury and Zgoba 2010).”
PERCEPTIONS OF SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION: COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES AND COMMUNITY EXPERIENCES (2006, background): “Only three studies have gathered data directly from sex offenders in the community, typically relying on survey data (Sack and Mason 1980; Tewksbury 2004, 2005), with these having sample sizes of 121 or less and response rates of 15%–20%.”
Social Policies Designed to Prevent Sexual Violence (2007, background): “…and may in fact decrease low-risk offenders’ potential for successful reintegration because of limited employment and educational opportunities, housing restrictions, and decreased social support (LaFond, 2005; Levenson & Cotter, 2005a; Petersilia, 2003; Tewksbury, 2005; Zevitz et al., 2000b).”