PERCEPTIONS OF SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION: COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES AND COMMUNITY EXPERIENCES

By R. Tewksbury, M. Lees. 2006

304 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01a9cfd20c9337c4a2ebf77e4d2d47bbf658210c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Sex Offender Laws (2008, background): “Sex offenders report experiencing harassment, social isolation, stigmatization, and feelings of vulnerability as a result of sex offender laws, all of which may prompt further misbehavior (Tewksbury, 2005; Tewksbury & Lees, 2006).”
Not in My Neighborhood (2008, background): “…problems finding and maintaining employment, difficulties securing quality housing, and problems protecting family members from shame and ridicule because of their relationship with a known sex offender (Levenson & Cotter, 2005b; Tewksbury, 2005; Tewksbury & Lees, 2006; Zevitz & Farkas, 2000).”
Public Awareness and Action Resulting From Sex Offender Community Notification Laws (2008, background): “Mustaine et al., 2006; Tewksbury, 2005; Tewksbury & Lees, 2006; Zevitz, 2003).”
Stigmatization of Sex Offenders (2012, background): “As a result of legal restrictions and public sentiments sex offenders frequently experience collateral consequences that are “wide-ranging, encompassing limitations on employment, education, housing, travel, immigration status, firearms ownership, political participation, public assistance, and fami”
Sex Offender Residence Restrictions: Unintended Consequences and Community Reentry (2007, unknown): “…that sex offender registration and community notification can interfere with community reentry and adjustment (Levenson & Cotter, 2005a; Levenson, D’Amora, & Hern, 2007; Sample & Streveler, 2003; Tewksbury, 2004; Tewksbury, 2005; Tewksbury & Lees, 2006; Zevitz, 2006a; Zevitz, Crim, & Farkas, 2000).”
Collateral Damage: Family Members of Registered Sex Offenders (2009, background): “A substantial proportion of sex offenders report housing disruption and being unable to live with supportive or dependent family as a result of SORN laws (Levenson and Cotter 2005a; Levenson et al. 2007b; Tewksbury and Lees 2006).”
Does Residential Proximity Matter? A Geographic Analysis of Sex Offense Recidivism (2008, background): “Overall, economic factors, not proximity to pools of available, potential victims are what appear to drive where registered sex offenders reside (Tewksbury & Lees, 2006; Tewksbury & Mustaine, in press–b).”
Assessing the Impact of Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification On Sex-Offending Trajectories (2010, unknown): “…of family and social relationships, public shaming, and in some instances, violence (Levenson, 2008; Levenson & Cotter, 2005; Levenson, D’Amora, & Hern, 2007; Levenson & Tewksbury, 2009; Mustaine et al., 2006a, 2006b; Tewksbury, 2004, 2005; Tewksbury & Lees, 2006; Tewksbury & Mustaine, 2006, 2007).”
A Meta-Analysis of Public Attitudes Toward Ex-Offenders (2016, background): “This is evident in the case of sex offenders, who are among one of the most discriminated against groups of exoffenders (Tewksbury & Lees, 2006; Viki, Fullerton, Raggett, Tait, & Wiltshire, 2012).”
Investigating the Continuity of Sex Offending: Evidence from the Second Philadelphia Birth Cohort (2009, unknown): “…unique to sex offenders and typically apply to all felons (Tewksbury & Lees, 2006), recent research has indicated that some of these adverse outcomes may have a greater impact on sex offender reintegration— particularly among female sex offenders (see Tewksbury, 2004, 2005; Tewksbury & Lees, 2006).”