Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance

By Gordon W. Cheung, Roger B. Rensvold. 2002

14,912 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f32e5ef13907b6f6fd0d9654d4e61eb83493c0d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: the case for the universality of self-esteem (2015, background): “The four-factor model exhibited scalar invariance (Cheung & Rensvold, 2002), which is a strong form of measurement invariance across cultures (Meredith, 1993).”
Transformational leadership and employee voice behavior : a Pygmalion mechanism. (2017, neutral): “As reported in Table 1, the seven-factor model fitted the data considerably better than any of the alternative models did (Bentler & Bonnet, 1980; Cheung & Rensvold, 2002).”
Exploring the relationships between academic buoyancy, academic self-concept, and academic performance: a study of mathematics and reading among primary school students (2019, methodology): “Invariance was determined by recommendations of Cheung and Rensvold (2002) for a change in CFI no greater than .01 between fully freed models and subsequent models that involved constraints.”
WAIS-IV and Clinical Validation of the Four- and Five-Factor Interpretative Approaches (2013, background): “(Cheung & Rensvold, 2002, p. 251)”.”
Meaning in life across the life span: Levels and correlates of meaning in life from emerging adulthood to older adulthood (2009, positive): “Establishing the measurement invariance of a psychological survey is a multi-step process that simultaneously tests the fit of data from multiple groups to a proposed structure for that survey (see e.g., Byrne, Shavelson, & Muthén, 1989; Chen, Sousa, & West, 2005; Cheung & Rensvold, 2002).”
Psychometric Properties of the CES-D-10 in a Psychiatric Sample (2013, result): “The change in CFI (>.01) also suggests significant improvement in the model (G. W. Cheung & Rensvold, 2002).”
Cross-Cultural Validation of Fear of Happiness Scale Across 14 National Groups (2014, methodology): “The most important tests are for configural, metric, and scalar invariance (e.g., Chen, 2008; Cheung & Rensvold, 2002), which are reported below.”
Hybrid and Alternating Identity Styles as Strategies for Managing Multicultural Identities (2018, background): “A CFI difference greater than 0.01 was considered to indicate improved fit (Cheung & Rensvold, 2002).”
Exploring the Effect of Disability, Race-Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status on Scores on the Self-Determination Inventory: Student Report (2018, methodology): “Cheung & Rensvold (2002) fit statistic guidelines were used to evaluate change in model fit between measurement invariance testing steps.”
The Love of Money and Pay Level Satisfaction: Measurement and Functional Equivalence in 29 Geopolitical Entities around the World (2006, positive): “Due to non-significant fit index change (ACFI = 0.9979 - 0.9951 = 0.0028), we concluded that metric equivalence was achieved across the 17 samples for the LOMS (Cheung and Rensvold, 2002).”
Validation of the Italian Versions of the Flourishing Scale and of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (2017, methodology): “Therefore, we followed the practice of using the ΔCFI criterion, with ΔCFI < .01 being considered evidence supporting the less parameterized model (Cheung & Rensvold, 2002).”
Determinants of Turnover Intention of Social Workers (2017, background): “When we consider that the chisquare test is sensitive to the sample size, a part of the reason might be the sample size of over 200 (Cheung & Rensvold, 2002).”