Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies

By Genevieve Bell, Mark Blythe, Phoebe Sengers. TCHI, 2005

532 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (2018, background): “…shift when used in different fields” and transferring complexity theories to the field of ELT is most likely to involve change and adaptation as we become more familiar with and confident in exploring their potential for our field in ways that reflect the unique characteristics of our domain.”
Empathy and experience in HCI (2008, background): “It has also resulted in a plethora of interesting new interactive devices, research methods, and design processes [16, 27, 42] as well as reflection on the scope and limits of theory and methodology within HCI [6, 9, 13, 23, 37, 55].”
Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home (2006, background): “Of particular interest is work that has focused on the relations between material artifacts and social interaction in everyday homemaking practices such as scheduling, and work that has emphasized the need to create culturally situated technologies for the home [2-4].”
Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery (2009, background): “This kind of ongoing reclassification comes as a direct result of a more proactive engagement in value discovery, defamiliarization [2], and a reorientation toward values as they are lived in situ.”