Improving the Practice of Conservation: a Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda for Conservation Science

By N. Salafsky, R. Margoluis, K. Redford, John G. Robinson. 2002

553 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f139d8403cbf377c8af59e9b00c2d8cc4c984a4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Companion Modelling: A Participatory Approach to Support Sustainable Development (2010, background): “Many criticisms have been levelled at participatory approaches, with regard to the inadequate consideration they give to the social contexts of approaches (Reed 2008; Faysse 2006; Salafsky et al. 2002; Margolouis and Salafsky 1998; Brandon and Wells 1992).”
Improving the effectiveness of interventions to balance conservation and development: a conceptual framework (2007, background): “Payments are thus integrated into processes that provide other benefits to the community, as is reflected in the results of Salafsky et al. (2002).”
Socio-economic and management implications of range-shifting species in marine systems (2012, unknown): “Adapted from Salafsky et al. (2002). E.”
An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation (2008, background): “Thus, stakeholders are empowered to implement effective on-theground management of ecosystem services, and social-ecological systems are resilient (they can absorb shocks and surprises) (1, 22, 24).”
Learning more effectively from experience (2005, background): “Developing the capacity for individuals to be able to learn effectively from their experiences is an important part of building the knowledge and skills in individuals and organizations to do good adaptive management (Kleiman et al. 2000, Salafsky et al. 2002).”
Utility and limitations of species richness metrics for conservation planning (2006, background): “Increasingly, however, conservation organizations are making an effort to measure success in terms of the condition and trend of populations, species, and ecosystems (Salafsky et al., 2002).”
Connectedness as a Core Conservation Concern: An Interdisciplinary Review of Theory and a Call for Practice (2014, background): “(1) Fundamental to conservation biology is conservation practice [49, 254]; (2) Conservation practice understands and positively influences human behavior [19, 49, 211]; (3) Behavior is determined by a complex blend of internal and external factors [11, 49, 88, 132]; (4) Internal factors are driven ”
Knowing But Not Doing: Selecting Priority Conservation Areas and the Research–Implementation Gap (2008, methodology): “More generally conservation biology has a poor record of translating research into action because most research has been theoretical (Salafsky et al. 2002).”
Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met? (2003, unknown): “This requires better setting of targets, making meaningful the global beneﬁts of tropical conservation, and our international responsibilities for meeting its costs. measurements of change, and learning from the results (Salafsky et al ., 2002).”
Understanding the Motivations and Satisfactions of Volunteers to Improve the Effectiveness of Citizen Science Programs (2015, background): “Applying evaluation, monitoring, and knowledge recycling and sharing to systematically adapt conservation programs can stimulate social learning and improve efficiency and effectiveness (Salafsky et al. 2002; Sutherland et al. 2004; Folke et al. 2005; Knight et al. 2006).”
How can a knowledge of the past help to conserve the future? Biodiversity conservation and the relevance of long-term ecological studies (2007, background): “Ideally, it is argued, conservation goals should not only aim to maintain or attain a certain biological state, but also reduce current and future threats and develop practitioners that can use various tools ‘to take effective action to detect and counter these threats’ ( Salafsky et al. 2002 ).”