Socio-economic and management implications of range-shifting species in marine systems

By E. Madin, Natalie Ban, Z. Doubleday, T. Holmes, G. Pecl, F. Smith. 2012

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Climate change is leading to a redistribution of marine species, altering ecosystem dynamics as species extend or shift their geographic ranges polewards with warming waters. In marine systems, range shifts have been observed in a wide diversity of species and ecosystems and are predicted to become more prevalent as environmental conditions continue to change. Large-scale shifts in the ranges of marine species will likely have dramatic socio-economic and management implications. Australia provides a unique setting in which to examine the range of consequences of climate-induced range shifts because it encompasses a diverse range of ecosystems, spanning tropical to temperate systems, within a single nation and is home to global sea surface temperature change ‘hotspots’ (where range shifts are particularly likely to occur). We draw on global examples with a particular emphasis on Australian cases to evaluate these consequences. We show that in Australia, range shifts span a variety of ecosystem types, trophic levels, and perceived outcomes (i.e., negative versus positive). The effect(s) of range shifts on socio-economic change variables are rarely reviewed, yet have the potential to have positive and/or negative effects on economic activities, human health and ecosystem services. Even less information exists about potential management responses to range-shifting species. However, synthesis of these diverse examples provides some initial guidance for selecting effective adaptive response strategies and management tools in the face of continuing climate-mediated range shifts.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffa9628780c6ee832bf2e5f55df34f089f3d1aec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

  1. Miranda C. Jones
  2. Will Figueira
  3. Dan A. Smale
  4. D. Booth
  5. Wwl Cheung
  6. Pippa J. Moore
  7. M. Pratchett
  8. M. Thomsen

In Ecology

  1. T. Wernberg
  2. Dan A. Smale
  3. M. Thomsen
  4. Pippa J. Moore
  5. M. Pratchett
  6. D. Booth
  7. Will Figueira
  8. Miranda C. Jones

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. M. Pratchett
  2. D. Booth
  3. Will Figueira
  4. Miranda C. Jones
  5. T. Wernberg
  6. Dan A. Smale
  7. Wwl Cheung
  8. Y. Nakamura

Citations in the corpus