Improving the effectiveness of interventions to balance conservation and development: a conceptual framework
By Stephen T. Garnett, J. Sayer, J. T. Toit. 2007
223 citations recorded by the source corpus.
There are numerous case studies around the world describing integrated conservation and development projects (ICDPs). Recently some localized syntheses have been published that use sophisticated statistics to identify patterns and causal linkages, but no attempt has yet been made to draw together lessons from across the globe. This paper is an attempt to provide a framework for such an analysis. A set of lessons is proposed for improving the prospects of ICDPs by giving consideration to each of the five capitals: natural, social, human, built, and financial. The language of ICDPs has been adopted by development agencies of all persuasions. There is now some urgency to identify the characteristics of the environment and the community in which success is most likely. This paper is intended as a step in that direction.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Environmental Chemistry, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c52566b3a7cce70a1bb3480c683aee5cd6e832c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Environmental Chemistry
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being (2011, background): “At the root of many long-standing disputes are differing models, metaphors, and ways of understanding the complexity of tradeoff decisions (Endter-Wada et al., 1998; Folke et al., 1998; Gartlan, 1998; Scott, 1998; Brosius and Russell, 2003; Norton, 2005; Hirsch, 2009; Robinson, 2011).”
- Assessing community-based conservation projects: A systematic review and multilevel analysis of attitudinal, behavioral, ecological, and economic outcomes (2013, methodology): “In fact, three of the four project design hypotheses (H-PD1, -PD-3, and -PD4) were supported to some degree, consistent with previous reviews emphasizing the importance of (a) building local institutional capacity [16] and training and skills development [15,22], (b) equitable distribution of benefi”