Analyzing Race Talk: Analyzing racial discourse: the discursive psychology of mind–world relationships
By D. Edwards. 2004
99 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9efe98c5497d2556082819a8e1f5484afd7458eb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Lindsay Reynolds
- Patricia M. Greenfield
- John A. Dixon
- Kevin Durrheim
- Brendesha M. Tynes
- Hedwig te Molder
- Petra Sneijder
In Language and Linguistics
- Lindsay Reynolds
- Patricia M. Greenfield
- John A. Dixon
- Kevin Durrheim
- Brendesha M. Tynes
- Hedwig te Molder
- Petra Sneijder
- Jonathan Potter
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Lindsay Reynolds
- Patricia M. Greenfield
- John A. Dixon
- Kevin Durrheim
- Brendesha M. Tynes
- Hedwig te Molder
- Petra Sneijder
Citations in the corpus
- Studying talk and embodied practices : toward a psychology of materiality of ‘race relations’. (2005, background): “Participants expend great effort to define their meanings and understandings of the ‘objects’ they evaluate, carefully differentiating instances and developing interested descriptions of the evaluated reality ( Edwards, 2003; Potter, 1998; Verkuyten, 1998).”
- Adolescence, race, and ethnicity on the Internet: A comparison of discourse in monitored vs. unmonitored chat rooms (2004, methodology): “In our data, bcommon senseQ notions of race are represented in both the statements participants made and in the questions they posed (Edwards, 2003).”
- Moral logic and logical morality: Attributions of responsibility and blame in online discourse on veganism (2005, background): “Edwards, 1997). Formulations of events as having a predictable pattern, or so-called script formulations, construct the event as factually robust and as knowable in advance, which reduces the need to ‘prove’ their occurrence ( Edwards, 1994, 1995, 2003 ).”