The big five personality factors : the psycholexical approach to personality

By Boele de Raad. 2000

393 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9eca923469bab7ecf321289e5549081783cfcc12

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

An Investigation of Personality Traits in Relation to Career Satisfaction (2003, background): “…Five personality model is widely regarded as a robust, general framework for conceptualizing personality traits (e.g., see Costa & McCrae, 1985; De Raad, 2000; Digman, 1990), a number of researchers contend that the Big Five is too broad and make the case for more narrow-scope personality…”
Taxonomy and structure of Croatian personality‐descriptive adjectives (2005, background): “However, verbs are especially useful for the description of interpersonal situations (De Raad, 2000).”
The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits (2007, background): “During the past few decades, many personality psychologists, especially those influenced by the lexical approach to person description (De Raad, 2000; Digman, 1990; Goldberg, 1982), have come to view personality traits in terms of five comprehensive dimensions, popularly known as the “Big Five” of…”
Correcting Big Five Personality Measurements for Acquiescence: An 18–Country Cross–Cultural Study (2013, background): “Our findings are thus comparable to those reported by De Raad, Perugini, Hrebickova, and Szarota (1998), whose investigation of Big Five congruences in eight Western countries yielded coefficients between .”
Mirages: On Anthropomorphism in Dialogue Systems (2023, unknown): “In an analysis of reviews of commercial voice assistants, Völkel et al. (2020) ﬁnd that the big ﬁve personality traits (De Raad, 2000) do not adequately describe user expectations of systems’ ‘personalities’.”
Impulsive buying tendency: Measuring important relationships with a new perspective and an indigenous scale (2016, background): “…the intellectual curiosity associated with this trait (McCrae & Costa, 2008), individuals high on this trait are considered to have willingness to enjoy new experiences and ideas (Myers, Sen, & Alexandrov, 2010) as well as the willingness to accept change (De Raad, 2000; Myers et al., 2010).”
The five‐factor personality inventory: cross‐cultural generalizability across 13 countries (2003, background): “In a wide variety of cultures trait-taxonomic research within the lexical paradigm has been carried out; history and findings are extensively documented elsewhere (e.g. De Raad, 2000; Digman, 1990; John, 1990; John, Angleitner, & Ostendorf, 1988).”
Predicting Personality from Twitter (2011, background): “It should be noted that the models dependence on trait terms indicates that the Big Five traits are based on a lexical approach to personality measurement [43], [9], [10], [16].”
Personality and self reported mobile phone use (2008, background): “Agreeableness is a trait that is most concerned with interpersonal relationships, that are based on the equal and honest exchange of information (DeRaad, 2000).”
PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits (2023, background): “Psychologists have developed various personality theories to understand common human traits, including the Big Five (Briggs, 1992; De Raad, 2000; Goldberg, 2013), Sixteen Personality Factors (16PF) (Cattell, 1957; Cattell and Mead, 2008), and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) (Myers, 1962,…”
The personal norm of reciprocity (2003, background): “Despite the fact that these two domains are opposite in the consequences they produce, the scales are not negatively associated in the Italian sample ( r ¼ (cid:1) 0.02, ns) and positively associated in the English sample ( r ¼ 0.16, p 0.001), suggesting that they are not measuring general persona”
The Hierarchical Structures of the NEO PI-R and the 16PF5. (2004, methodology): “Following the publication of the FFM (Digman, 1990; Peabody & Goldberg, 1989; De Raad, 2000), the interest in personality psychology and the number of studies about the structure of personality have considerably increased (Meyer de Stadelhofen, Rossier, Rigozzi, Zimmermann, & Berthoud, submitted;…”
Predicting personality with social media (2011, background): “It should be noted that the models dependence on trait terms indicates that the Big Five traits are based on a lexical approach to personality measurement [44, 9, 10, 15].”
An Investigation of Big Five Personality Traits and Career Decidedness Among Early and Middle Adolescents (2005, background): “…and validity of the Big Five constructs of Openness, Conscientiousness, Extroversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism in a wide range of cultures, ethnic and demographic groups, and research settings (Costa & McCrae, 1994; De Raad, 2000; Ten Berge & De Raad, 1999; Tokar, Vaux, & Swanson, 1995).”