Energy consumption and GDP revisited: A panel analysis of developed and developing countries
By Chien‐Chiang Lee, Chun-ping Chang. 2007
308 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e9b744a13581c895b8e22f6e671572d2861bda0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- Gazi Salah Uddin
- A. Belke
- Christian Dreger
- Frauke Dobnik
- Kostas Bithas
- P. Kalimeris
- Clive Richardson
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- A. Belke
- Christian Dreger
- Frauke Dobnik
- Gazi Salah Uddin
- Kostas Bithas
- P. Kalimeris
- Clive Richardson
Citations in the corpus
- Energy consumption-economic growth relationship and carbon dioxide emissions in China (2011, background): “…e.g. Glasure, 2002; Lee, 2005; Chen et al., 2007; Mahadevan and Asafu-Adjaye, 2007; Squalli, 2007; Akinlo, 2008; Chontanawat et al., 2008; Lee and Chang, 2007,2008; Narayan and Smyth, 2009; Wolde-Rufael, 2009), which is researched mainly based on one of two perspectives: the time series…”
- Economic growth-electricity consumption causality in 12 European countries: A dynamic panel data approach (2010, background): “Among others, Lee and Chang (2007) find evidence of causality from GDP to energy consumption in a sample of 18 developing countries and bidirectional causality in a sample of 22 developed countries and Al Iriani (2006) finds a unidirectional causality from GDP to energy consumption for panel data…”
- The causality between energy consumption and economic growth: A multi-sectoral analysis using non-stationary cointegrated panel data (2010, methodology): “…1998) that allows for two structural breaks -on the single time series to check for the existence of one or multiple structural breaks as suggested in Lee and Chang (2007), and the series still remain non-stationary and integrated of order one I(1) for the vast majority of the cross section units.”
- Non-Linear Unit Root Properties of Crude Oil Production (2009, unknown): “Related studies that have tested for a unit root in energy consumption are Al-Iriani (2006), Chen and Lee (2007), Hsu et al. (2007), Joyuex and Ripple (2007), Lee (2005), Lee and Chang (2007, 2007a) and Narayan and Smyth (2007).”
- The causal relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in Lebanon (2012, background): “…within a multivariate framework (see e.g. Apergis and Payne, 2011; Costantini and Martini, 2010; Huang et al., 2008; Joyeux and Ripple, 2011; Lee and Chang, 2007; Mahadevan and Asafu-Adjaye, 2007; Narayan and Smyth, 2009; Narayan et al., 2010; Ozturk and Acaravci, 2011; Ozturk et al., 2010;…”
- A meta-analysis investigation of the direction of the energy-GDP causal relationship: implications for the growth-degrowth dialogue (2014, background): “…Morimoto and Hope (2004), Wolde-Rufael (2004), Thoma (2004), Lee (2005), Lee and Chang (2005), Soytas and Sari (2006b), Lee (2006), Ang (2007), Lee and Chang (2007a), Narayan and Singh (2007), Soytas and Sari (2007), Yuan et al. (2007), Lee and Chang, 2008; Narayan and Smyth (2008),…”
- Energy Consumption and Economic Growth – New Insights into the Cointegration Relationship (2010, unknown): “This literature estimates panel-based error-correction models to perform Granger causality tests (see, e.g. Lee, 2005; Al-Iriani, 2006; Mahadevan and Asafu-Adjaye, 2007; Lee and Chang, 2007, 2008; Apergis and Payne, 2009a,b; Lee and Lee, 2010; Costantini and Martini, 2010).”
- Energy consumption and economic growth revisited: Does the size of unrecorded economy matter? (2008, methodology): “For example, using the panel data for 40 countries (22 developed and 18 developing countries), Lee and Chang (2007) showed that there exist a unidirectional causal relationship running from GDP to energy consumption in the developing countries and a bidirectional causality (or feedback) in the…”