Predator-recognition training enhances survival of brook trout: evidence from laboratory and field-enclosure studies

By R. S. Mirza, D. Chivers. 2000

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e70186dd3ff68b1a9866775c461e2a71f165f50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Determining the fitness consequences of antipredation behavior (2005, background): “Studies showing that antipredation behaviors accrue fitness benefits under attack (Table 1) have shown that responding quickly on attack augments survival (Fitzgibbon, 1989; Kenward, 1978) and that correct identification of attacking predators and appropriate responses to the predators are important”
Learning, memory and predator avoidance by freshwater snails: effects of experience on predator recognition and defensive strategy (2006, background): “…show that na€ıve prey may fail to recognize predators based on kairomones alone, but may learn to associate kairomones with predation risk when alarm cues are presented in conjunction with kairmones (Chivers et al. 1995; Woody & Mathis 1998; Mirza & Chivers 2000; 443 Study of Animal Behaviour.”
Response of juvenile rainbow trout to varying concentrations of chemical alarm cue: response thresholds and survival during encounters with predators (2003, background): “We needed to end the trials when a trout was captured because the predation event would release chemical alarm cues and alert all the remaining prey that the predator was a threat ( Mirza and Chivers 2000, 2001b ).”
The need to understand the behaviour of fish reared for mariculture or restocking (2006, background): “Some studies showed an effect which could have a positive influence on survival (Brown and Smith, 1998; Nodtvedt et al., 1999; Mirza and Chivers, 2000; Hossain et al., 2002), while others found no effect (Johnsson and Abrahams, 1991; Vilhunen and Hirvonen, 2003).”
Learning about Danger: Chemical Alarm Cues and Threat‐Sensitive Assessment of Predation Risk by Fishes (2011, background): “…other species, including brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans, Gasterosteidae; Chivers et al. 1995), brook trout (Salvelinus namaycush, Salmonidae; Mirza & Chivers 2000, 2001), brown trout (Salmo trutta, Salmonidae; Alvarez & Nicieza 2003), common bully (Gobiomorphus cotidianus, Eleotridae;…”
Predator avoidance behaviour in wild and hatchery‐reared brown trout: the role of experience and domestication (2003, background): “There is growing evidence that learning plays a key role in predator avoidance for amphibians and fishes (Olla & Davis, 1988, 1989; Berejikian, 1995; Mirza & Chivers, 2000; unpubl.”
The future of stock enhancements: lessons for hatchery practice from conservation biology (2002, background): “) Like foraging behaviour, there is ample evidence that antipredator behaviour improves considerably with experience (Kanayama and Tuge 1968; Fraser 1974; OllaandDavis1989; CsanyiandDoka1993; Jarvi and Uglem 1993; Berejikian 1995; Brown and Smith 1996; Mirza and Chivers 2000; Hossain et al. 2001).”
Innate and enhanced predator recognition in hatchery-reared chinook salmon (2003, background): “Moreover, chinook salmon (Berejikian et al. 1999), other salmonids (e.g., Brown & Smith 1997, Mirza & Chivers 2000 ), do not exhibit a fright response to swordtail extract.”
Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectusThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. (2010, unknown): “In the last decade, a few studies have shown that learned predator recognition enhances survival during direct encounters with predators (Mirza and Chivers 2000; Gazdewich and Chivers 2002).”
Innate and Learned Predator Recognition Mediated by Chemical Signals in Eurycea nana (2008, background): “Thus, all E. nana were collected relatively recently from the wild and were likely to have maintained their original predatory responses (Mirza & Chivers 2000).”
Less is more: social learning of predator recognition requires a low demonstrator to observer ratio in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) (2004, background): “Studies have shown how acquired predator recognition can be transmitted from knowledgeable, predator-experienced fish to naive individuals (Kieffer and Colgan 1992; Mirza and Chivers 2000; Kelley and Magurran 2003; Kelley et al. 2003), and via chemical signals alone (Chivers and Smith 1998; Mirza an”