Innate and enhanced predator recognition in hatchery-reared chinook salmon
By B. Berejikian, E. P. Tezak, A. L. LaRae. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 2003
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3894d97b964139ce597866552c098bbf57b68c8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Responses of American toad tadpoles to predation cues: behavioural response thresholds, threat-sensitivity and acquired predation recognition (2006, unknown): “, 1988; Kiesecker & Blaustein, 1997) and fish (Berejikian et al., 2003; Hawkins et al., 2004).”
- Environmental enrichment reduces maladaptive risk-taking behavior in salmon reared for conservation (2011, background): “…studies that show that it is also possible to condition artificially-reared fish to recognise predators, further enhancing anti-predatory behaviors (Berejikian et al., 2003; Vilhunen, 2006), just as it had previously been shown for birds (e.g. Maloney and McLean, 1995; McLean et al., 1999) and…”
- Exposure to variable spatial information in the early rearing environment generates asymmetries in social interactions in cod (Gadus morhua) (2005, unknown): “…in fish is partly innate and partly depends on environmental characteristics with respect to predation risk (Seghers 1974; Immelmann 1975; Giles and Huntingford 1984; Breden et al. 1987; Magurran 1990; Berejikian et al. 2003), but it can arise through experience (Kelley and Magurren 2003).”
- Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectusThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. (2010, unknown): “2007a) and salmonid fishes (Berejikian et al. 2003; Vilhunen and Hirvonen 2003; Hawkins et al. 2004, 2007; Scheurer et al. 2007), as well as larval toads (Laurila et al.”
- Learning about Danger: Chemical Alarm Cues and Threat‐Sensitive Assessment of Predation Risk by Fishes (2011, background): “For example, Berejikian et al. (2003) found that the strength of an ‘innate’ response to novel predators could be enhanced through conditioning with alarm cues.”
- The role of learning in the development of threat-sensitive predator avoidance by fathead minnows (2005, background): “Many prey species do not show an innate recognition of their potential predators (invertebrates: Rochette et al. 1998; birds: Curio et al. 1978; mammals: McLean et al. 1996; Griffin et al. 2001), including fish (Mathis et al. 1993; Chivers & Smith 1994a; but see: Berejikian et al. 2003; Vilhunen &”
- Threat-sensitive generalization of predator recognition by larval amphibians (2009, background): “This ‘innate’ predator recognition has been studied in a variety of taxa, including mammals, birds, amphibians, and fishes (e.g., Kiesecker and Blaustein 1997; Berejikian et al. 2003; Fendt 2006).”
- Stress-associated impacts of short-term holding on fishes (2006, background): “The presence and perceived threat of these fishes may have detrimental stress effects (Berejikian et al. 2003; Chang and Liao 2003a).”