The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray's anxiety and impulsivity dimensions.

By R. Torrubia, C. Ávila, J. Moltó, X. Caseras. 2001

1,309 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e4773042f22e65ba432c8f21f260a6adc1e8313

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Clinical Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The interaction of reinforcement sensitivity and life events in the prediction of anhedonic depression and mixed anxiety-depression symptoms (2007, background): “The scales showed good internal consistency (Torrubia et al., 2001), construct validity (Avila & Parcet, 2000, 2001) and correlate with other measures of anxiety and impulsivity (Torrubia et al., 2001).”
Is boredom associated with problem gambling behaviour? It depends on what you mean by ‘boredom’ (2010, methodology): “The internal consistency has been reported to range from 0.82 to 0.83 for the SP scale, and 0.75 to 0.78 for the SR scale (Torrubia et al., 2001).”
The Bright and Dark Sides of Personality: Implications for Personnel Selection in Individual and Team Contexts (2007, background): “Evidence indicates that impulsivity is linked to heightened reward sensitivity (Torrubia et al., 2001).”
Behavioral Approach System (BAS) Sensitivity and Bipolar Spectrum Disorders: A Retrospective and Concurrent Behavioral High-Risk Design (2006, methodology): “Findings also support the construct validity of the SPSRQ (Torrubia et al., 2001).”
Five reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality questionnaires: Comparison, validity and generalization (2016, background): “SPSRQ-20 (Aluja & Blanch, 2011) is short 20-item version of SPSRQ (Torrubia et al., 2001) containing two 10-items scales: the Sensitivity to Punishment (SP) and the Sensitivity to Reward (SR) with yes/no response format.”
A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures (2006, methodology): “The SPSRQ was intended to be theoretically consistent with Gray’s work and to improve upon weaknesses noted in the BIS/BAS scales’ item content (see Torrubia et al., 2001 for a detailed discussion of these issues).”
Individual Differences in Music Reward Experiences (2013, background): “Similar questionnaires have been developed in order to assess individual differences to overall sensitivity to reward experiences (BIS/BAS, Carver & White, 1994; Sensitivity to Reward/Sensitivity to Punishment Questionaire , Torrubia et al., 2001).”
What Are the Most Important Dimensions of Personality?Evidence from Studies of Descriptors in Diverse Languages (2009, background): “There are a number of models (e.g., that including sensitivity to reward and sensitivity to punishment; Torrubia et al., 2001) that meet this description, but many of them contain only one or two factors, giving them little in the way of comprehensiveness, and they have been measured exclusively via”
Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation system scales and the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire in a sample of eating disordered patients (2009, positive): “With regard to the SPSRQ, the internal consistency is lower for the SR scale (a = .62) than for the SP scale (a = .87), a finding also reported by Caseras et al. (2003) and Torrubia et al. (2001).”