Drawing conclusions about causes from systematic reviews of risk factors: The Cambridge Quality Checklists

By J. Murray, David P. Farrington, Manuel Eisner. 2009

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e0bea3751fa524c495b0308695e9f69040f0830

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. David P. Farrington
2. J. Murray
3. I. Sekol
4. R. Loeber
5. R. F. Olsen
6. Maria M. Ttofi
7. F. Lösel

In Health

1. David P. Farrington
2. Maria M. Ttofi
3. I. Sekol
4. J. Murray
5. R. Loeber

In Statistics and Probability

1. David P. Farrington
2. I. Sekol
3. Maria M. Ttofi
4. J. Murray
5. F. Lösel

Citations in the corpus

• Bullying perpetration and victimization as predictors of delinquency and depression in the Pittsburgh Youth Study (2011, background): “In order to establish whether there is some kind of facilitating effect of the earlier behaviour on the later one, it is important to investigate whether bullying predicts delinquency, and victimization predicts depression, after controlling for earlier risk factors ( Murray et al. , 2009”
• Do the victims of school bullies tend to become depressed later in life? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of longitudinal studies (2011, background): “…be treated with caution, the current meta-analysis indicates that school bullying victimization is a unique childhood risk factor for laterdepression,evenaftercontrolling fora largenumberofpre-existing risk factors (a sound strategy for non-experimental longitudinal designs; Murray et al., 2009).”
• School bullying as a predictor of violence later in life: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal studies (2012, background): “In order to establish whether school bullying per se is followed by an increase in aggression or violence, it is important to investigate whether this factor predicts the outcome after controlling for earlier risk factors that predict both school bullying and the outcome (Murray et al., 2009).”
• Effects of parental imprisonment on child antisocial behaviour and mental health: a systematic review (2009, methodology): “To assess whether parental imprisonment is a risk factor, studies need to use representative sampling methods, include a reasonable number of study participants, use good measures of parental imprisonment and the child outcome, and clearly establish that parental imprisonment came before the outcome”
• Children's Antisocial Behavior, Mental Health, Drug Use, and Educational Performance After Parental Incarceration (2012, background): “As recommended by Murray, Farrington, and Eisner (2009), in addition to coding the five items above and coding the basic study design (prospective, retrospective, or cross-sectional), we also coded the covariates that were controlled in each study.”