Historical evolution of technological diversification

By John A. Cantwell, Giovanna Vertova. 2004

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9de98502f41a53c4ecda4eb6899eacc8f4338912

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms (2006, background): “However, Cantwell and Vertova (2004) find the opposite tendency at the country level.”
The Internationalization of Corporate R&D: A Review of the Evidence and Some Policy Implications for Home Countries1 (2009, background): “27 Additionally, at least three developing home countries, namely, China, Malaysia, and Singapore, have put in place policies that explicitly encourage outward FDI for the purposes of asset exploitation, as well as asset augmentation (UNCTAD, 2006, p. 163).”
Technological Relatedness and Knowledge Space: Entry and Exit of US Cities from Patent Classes (2015, background): “In more explicitly geographical research VERTOVA (1999) and CANTWELL and VERTOVA (2004) illustrate the cumulative nature of technological development at the country level, and the long-run relationship between country size and level of technological diversification.”
Innovation and international business (2017, background): “Since individual locations are inevitably specialized in their activity, and indeed increasingly specialized owing in part to greater subsidiary-level specialization within MNEs (Cantwell and Vertova 2004), the most suitable and potentially innovative combinations of activity now commonly require in”
Creating Competition? Globalisation and the Emergence of New Technology Producers (2005, background): “Cantwell and Vertova (2004) analysed a very long run of the same USPTO data (1890–1990) to assess the relationship between a country’s size and technological diversification.”
Mapping Knowledge Space and Technological Relatedness in US Cities (2013, methodology): “We are to suppose from this division, Christensen’s (1997) notion of disruptive innovation notwithstanding, that radical innovations hold the potential to sweep away leading firms, industries and regional economies, periodically ushering in new technologies and new firms, and reworking geographies o”
An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment (2010, unknown): “This in turn helps to reinforce the institutional differentiation of host locations, as well as the distinctiveness of the technological structures of their national (or regional) systems of innovation (Cantwell & Vertova, 2004).”