Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead

By Jyrki Wallenius, J. Dyer, P. Fishburn, Ralph E. Steuer, Stanley Zionts, Kalyanmoy Deb. Management Sciences, 2008

862 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9de94b6824ffb10cca9d8fa4cc9d62beb7f81969

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis (2016, methodology): “With respect to all MCDM methods the AHP shows the highest number of publications since the early 1990s (Wallenius et al. 2008; Sipahi andTimor 2010;Hülle et al. 2011).”
Pairs trading and outranking: The multi-step-ahead forecasting case (2010, methodology): “Multi-criteria decision methods (Figueira et al., 2005a; Wallenius et al., 2008) are now used in various fields and are becoming increasingly popular in finance as underlined in different surveys (Zopounidis, 1999; Steuer and Na, 2003; Spronk et al., 2005; Xidonas and Psarras, 2009; Duygun Fethi…”
Efficient Multi-User Computation Offloading for Mobile-Edge Cloud Computing (2015, methodology): “In practice the proper weights that capture a user’s valuation s on computational energy and time can be determined by applying the multi-attribute utility approach in the multiple crite ria decision making theory [25].”
Criteria in AHP: A Systematic Review of Literature (2015, neutral): “For those that used AHP, two ways to evaluate the alternatives were observed: rating, also called absolute judgment [4], for the analysis of quantitative criteria and pairwise or relative judgment [4], for the analysis of qualitative criteria.”
ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications (2016, neutral): “Examples are Wallenius et al. (2008) (MAUT) and Figueira et al. (2013) (ELECTRE).”
Supplier selection-order allocation: A two stage multiple criteria dynamic programming approach (2011, methodology): “The analytic hierarchy process (AHP), first proposed by Saaty (1977), is a popular multiple criteria decision-making technique (Wallenius et al., 2008) that is adequate to incorporate both qualitative and quantitative criteria.”
Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations (2017, methodology): “In Table 4, MCDA methods are grouped in four “families”: AHP/ANP, MAVT/MAUT, outranking methods and goal and reference point methods.”
Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (2014, methodology): “[132] it seems that the AHP has been by far the most studied and applied MCDM method, at least judging by the number of publications.”
A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science (2017, background): “general overview on multiple criteria decision maki ng [45], OR-MS in Asia [5], OR-MS in developing countries [46], production and operation s management [17,35], data envelopment”