ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications

By Kannan Govindan, Martin Brandt Jepsen. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016

540 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Are MCDA Methods Benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods (2020, methodology): “The publication of Zanakis et al. [29] presents results of benchmarks for eight MCDA methods (Simple Additive Weighting, Multiplicative Exponential Weighting, TOPSIS, ELECTRE, and four AHP variants).”
A Comparative Study of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods under Stochastic Inputs (2016, background): “A comprehensive review of the applications of ELECTRE can be found in [32], which supports the argument that it is still an active ﬁeld of research.”
THE USE OF THE PIVOT PAIRWISE RELATIVE CRITERIA IMPORTANCE ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE WEIGHTS OF CRITERIA (2018, methodology): “The overview of the previously mentioned methods, as well as of their application, is considered by Zavadskas et al. (2015), Gul et al. (2016), Stefano et al. (2015), Govindan and Jepsen (2016), Behzadian et al. (2010), Baležentis T. and Baležentis A. (2013).”
A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments (2017, background): “Some other partial aggregation approaches such as ELimination and Choice Expressing REality (ELECTRE) and Preference Ranking Organisation Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) have respectively suggested by Roy [31] and Brans and Mareschal [32].”