Moral Intensity and Willingness to Pay Concerning Farm Animal Welfare Issues and the Implications for Agricultural Policy

By R. Bennett, J. Anderson, R. Blaney. 2002

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9de5aa225bd26fdb2b9371b1192e132df370f612

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Wim Verbeke
2. F. Vanhonacker
3. B. Bock

In General Decision Sciences

1. Wim Verbeke

Citations in the corpus

• Farm Animal Welfare, Consumer Willingness to Pay, and Trust: Results of a Cross-National Survey (2010, unknown): “…estimate the benefits of legislation that would, for example, improve conditions for veal calves and hens (Bennett and Larson 1996), ban exports of live animals destined for slaughter (Bennett, Anderson, and Blaney 2002), and ensure a more humane way of slaughtering pigs (Bennett and Blaney 2002).”
• SEGMENTATION BASED ON CONSUMERS' PERCEIVED IMPORTANCE AND ATTITUDE TOWARD FARM ANIMAL WELFARE * (2007, background): “However, many studies have criticised claimed consumer willingness to pay, referring to the duality between consumers and citizen (Korthals 2001; Bennett, Anderson, and Blaney 2002; Carlsson, Frykblom, and Lagerkvist 2004; Liljenstolpe 2005).”