A stress test of fairness measures in models of social utility

By Gary E. Bolton, Axel Ockenfels. 2005

82 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9da5163d0ba2d6867c2a0d8d7211734df2e3fe4c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Matthias Sutter
2. Martin Sefton
3. J. Potters
4. Jason Dana
5. J. Kuang
6. Roberto A. Weber
7. Lise Vesterlund
8. John M. Spraggon

In Safety Research

1. Matthias Sutter
2. Lise Vesterlund
3. Martin Sefton
4. Roberto A. Weber
5. J. Potters
6. Jason Dana
7. J. Kuang
8. John M. Spraggon

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Lise Vesterlund
2. J. Potters
3. Matthias Sutter
4. Martin Sefton
5. Jason Dana
6. Roberto A. Weber
7. John M. Spraggon
8. Robert J. Oxoby

Citations in the corpus

• More than Thirty Years of Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments: Motives, Variations, and a Survey of the Recent Literature (2013, unknown): “Examples are Bolton and Ockenfels (2005) and Blanco et al. (2011). alternating offer game with a second-round pie 2p at the level 2 1 / 4p p= , with 1p denoting the first-round pie.”
• Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness (2007, background): “…utility in others' payoffs (Andreoni 1990; Andreoni and Miller 2000), are averse to advantageous payoff differences (Fehr and Schmidt 1999; Bolton and Ockenfels 2000), or want to maximize total social payoffs or the lowest payoff to any one party (Charness and Rabin 2002; Engelmann and…”
• Outcomes versus intentions: On the nature of fair behavior and its development with age (2007, background): “4 One might argue (like Bolton & Ockenfels, 2005 ) that the rejection rate of the default in Game [8/2] should be”
• Leading-by-example and signaling in voluntary contribution games: an experimental study (2007, methodology): “5 A similar analysis could be performed using the social preference model of Bolton and Ockenfels (2000). See Bolton and Ockenfels (2005) for a comparison of social preference models based on relative payoffs considerations and those based on (inferred) intentions.”
• Fairness in bargaining (2005, unknown): “(1986); Fehr et al. (1993); Fehr et al.”
• Mine and yours: Property rights in dictator games (2008, background): “However, once these concerns are properly measured, there is evidence that fairness models can provide good predictions of individual behavior (e.g., Bolton and Ockenfels, 2005; Charness and Rabin, 2002; Engelmann and Strobel, 2004).”