Microbial diversity in soil: selection microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness.

By P. Garbeva, J. A. Veen, J. D. Elsas. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2004

1,462 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Plant Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d5496b7ea2017a50562eb9ed6250aba52bb6f11

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. N. Eisenhauer
2. R. Larkin
3. Zoe G. Cardon
4. D. Gage
5. H. Hawkins
6. Zander S. Venter
7. K. Jacobs
8. A. Ebrahimi

In Plant Science

1. R. Richards
2. G. Berg
3. A. Sessitsch
4. M. Watt
5. S. Compant
6. G. Rebetzke
7. P. Bakker
8. J. Chaparro

In Soil Science

1. N. Eisenhauer
2. R. Richards
3. M. Watt
4. G. Rebetzke
5. Z. Rengel
6. C. Cambardella
7. S. Scheu
8. J. Kirkegaard

Citations in the corpus

• Higher rates of nitrogen fertilization decrease soil enzyme activities, microbial functional diversity and nitrification capacity in a Chinese polytunnel greenhouse vegetable land (2010, background): “So does the soil microbial diversity in maintaining soil health and quality ( Garbeva et al. 2004; Janvier et al. 2007; Paul 2007).”
• Plant-driven selection of microbes (2009, background): “…there are several contrasting reports in the literature indicating plant or soil type as dominant factor (Girvan et al. 2003; Grayston et al. 1998; Nunan et al. 2005) in more or less all studies the influence of plant species is clearly visible [rev. in (Berg and Smalla 2008; Garbeva et al. 2004)].”
• Understanding and Enhancing Soil Biological Health: The Solution for Reversing Soil Degradation (2015, background): “Similarly, some soils are considered to be “disease suppressive” wherein often poorly-defined components of a diverse soil microbial community confer disease resistance to plants [70,98,99].”
• Phosphorus uptake and rhizosphere properties of intercropped and monocropped maize, faba bean, and white lupin in acidic soil (2010, background): “…the solubility of the dominating Fe and Al phosphates increases with increasing pH. Soil microorganisms play a critical role in maintenance of soil function (Garbeva et al. 2004) since they are involved in mineralization and mobilization of nutrients required for plant growth (Song et al. 2007).”
• Rhizosphere: its structure, bacterial diversity and significance (2014, background): “The aerobic bacteria are relatively lesser because of the reduced oxygen levels in the rhizosphere owing to root respiration (Garbeva et al. 2004).”
• Physiological traits and cereal germplasm for sustainable agricultural systems (2007, background): “Studies to reveal the nature of the exudates will be challenging because rhizosphere organisms depend both on the plant and the soil type (Garbeva et al., 2004), and physical factors such as temperature.”
• Vineyard soil bacterial diversity and composition revealed by 16S rRNA genes: Differentiation by vineyard management (2016, background): “These processes and their controls on soil structure and nutrient availability reflect the possible indirect effects of soil microorganisms on plant growth, health and fruit development (Garbeva et al., 2004; Compant et al., 2010).”
• High throughput sequencing analysis of biogeographical distribution of bacterial communities in the black soils of northeast China (2014, background): “It is known that soil microbial community diversity and composition vary distinctly between different soil ecosystems, and this variation is thought to be related to the changes in a number of soil biotic and abiotic factors (Garbeva et al., 2004; Ramette and Tiedje, 2007; Green et al., 2008).”
• Induced Systemic Resistance as a Mechanism of Disease Suppression by Rhizobacteria (2005, background): “Since the rhizosphere microflora is extremely diverse, a dynamic interplay between the members of the microbial community occurs, mediated by synergistic and antagonistic interactions, within the limits of the nutrients available (Garbeva et al., 2004).”
• Pasture management clearly affects soil microbial community structure and N-cycling bacteria (2009, background): “Soil bacterial communities have been shown to vary between plant species (Garbeva et al., 2004).”
• Assessing changes in soil microbial communities and carbon mineralization in Bt and non-Bt corn residue-amended soils (2007, result): “Our observations agree with other research demonstrating that soil texture is one of most important abiotic determinants of soil microbial communities (Bossio et al., 1998; Chiarini et al., 1998; Buyer et al., 1999; Dalmastri et al., 1999; Girvan et al., 2003; Garbeva et al., 2004).”
• Microbial communities associated with the root system of wild olives (Olea europaea L. subsp. europaea var. sylvestris) are good reservoirs of bacteria with antagonistic potential against Verticillium dahliae (2011, background): “In a similar way, different soils show different physicochemical characteristics that influence microbial communities by providing a specific habitat for selecting specific adapted microbes and also by influencing plant root exudation (Garveba et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2008).”
• Manipulating the soil microbiome to increase soil health and plant fertility (2012, background): “Many studies have focused on the disease-suppressive ability of particular taxons or group of microbes but this ability of soils to suppress disease has been linked to the soil community as a whole (Garbeva et al. 2004; Malajczuk 1983; Mendes et al. 2011).”