Effect of Pore Size and Void Fraction on Cellular Adhesion, Proliferation, and Matrix Deposition
By J. Zeltinger, J. K. Sherwood, D. A. Graham, Ralph Müeller, L. Griffith. Tissue engineering, 2001
813 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d376a9cf38220d3f55e9d0b35b41c53a645c45b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
- K. Leong
- S. Hollister
- C. K. Chua
- Benjamin M. Wu
- Helena N. Chia
- M. Chandrasekaran
- Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
- W. Y. Yeong
In Biomedical Engineering
- S. Hollister
- K. Leong
- C. K. Chua
- Ali Khademhosseini
- Benjamin M. Wu
- Helena N. Chia
- M. Chandrasekaran
- Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
In Surgery
- S. Hollister
- Benjamin M. Wu
- Helena N. Chia
- K. Leong
- Jae Nam
- Binil Starly
- Andrew Darling
- Ali Khademhosseini
Citations in the corpus
- The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. (2005, background): “In PLLA scaffolds, vascular smooth muscle cells preferentially bind to one range of pore sizes (63 - 150 μm) while fibroblasts bind to a wider range (38 - 150 μm)[12, 13].”
- Electrospun Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering of Vascular Grafts (2013, neutral): “For synthetic polymers such as polyurethane [69], PLGA [70] or for natural proteins such as gelatin [71], pore size and porosity in general are linked to cellular activity in many different types of cells [72–74].”
- State of the art and future directions of scaffold‐based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective (2007, background): “A review of the current bone engineering literature suggests that the scaffolds should fulfil a range of minimal requirements (Zeltinger et al., 2001; Karande et al., 2004; Karageorgiou et al., 2005; O’Brien et al., 2005).”
- Scaffold development using selective laser sintering of polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite biocomposite blends. (2003, background): “Scaffold characteristics and properties such as porosity, surface area to volume ratio, pore size, pore interconnectivity, structural strength, shape (or overall geometry) and biocompatibility [5–9] are often considered to be critical factors in their design and fabrication.”
- Bio-CAD modeling and its applications in computer-aided tissue engineering (2005, background): “In general, this type of scaffolds usually have intricate architecture, porosity, pore size and shape, and interconnectivity in order to provide the needed structural integrity, strength, transport, and ideal micro-environment for cell and tissue ingrowth [34–36].”
- Rapid prototyping in tissue engineering: challenges and potential. (2004, methodology): “Zeltinger et al. [ 45 ] performed a study on a TheriForm-built PLLA scaffold with different pore sizes using canine dermal fibroblasts (DmFb), vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) and microvascular epithelial cells (MVEC).”
- Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems. (2004, background): “30 Zeltinger, J. et al. (2001) Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation and matrix deposition.”
- A Review of Three-Dimensional Printing in Tissue Engineering (2016, positive): “The effects of particulate and pore size have also been explored to examine the effect on cell attachment, growth, and matrix deposition.(35) Although PFP is limited to powdered materials, this technique is capable of fabricating scaffolds from several materials such as titanium and magnesium that a”
- Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography (2012, background): “Interconnections between pores also play an important role in cell seeding, migration and nutrient transport during culture of the scaffolds [39,56].”