Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation: Exploring 'Globalisation 2'--A new model of industry organisation

By Philip Cooke. 2005

535 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d214e101dda7c6e71a2cfdd7f65250af0c2f56f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Strategic agency and institutional change: investigating the role of universities in regional innovation systems (RISs) (2017, background): “The paper starts from systematic regional innovation approaches distinguishing knowledge exploration and exploitation subsystems (Cooke, 2005) embedded within wider socio-political structures (Lundvall, 2007).”
Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future (2020, background): “Skeptics argue that Triple Helix is a normative concept rather than a neutral theoretical framework and criticize the model for lacking solid theoretical foundations (Cooke 2005: 1130; Shinn 2002: 609; Viale & Pozzali 2010: 576).”
Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university's structural configuration on third mission performance (2019, background): “Regular interactions between knowledge producers, users, intermediaries and policy makers create networks with systemic regional properties (Cooke, 2005).”
Contests for Cooperation - A New Approach in German Innovation Policy (2005, background): “See Cooke (2005) for a review of recent developments.”
Do clusters capabilities matter? An empirical application of the resource-based view in clusters (2007, background): “To get to know more see Cooke (1998, 2005).”
Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions (2010, background): “Furthermore, the triple helix seems to overstate the extent to which these activities take place throughout universities, as opposed to being confined to a few fields of academic research (Mowery & Sampat, 2005), and a few locations (notably MIT) (Cooke, 2005; Gunasekara, 2006a).”
The Economic and Innovation Contribution of Universities: A Regional Perspective (2009, background): “The position of universities within regional innovation systems can be conceived as that of ‘knowledge transceivers’, receiving knowledge from global sources and transmitting it to more localised actors (Cooke, 2005).”
What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy (2009, background): “According to Cooke (2005), the latter fall short in explaining the uneven geography of innovation, i.e., why some locations perform better in terms of exploiting knowledge spillovers, which is likely to be influenced by purposeful action at the level of the region.”
Open innovation and company culture: Internal openness makes the difference (2017, background): “…and incorporate knowledge into the place (location) and the team (or individual), which are removed from the place of origin (Bondarenko, 2015; Cooke, 2005; Döring and Schnellenbach, 2004; Fritsch and Franke, 2004; Kotsemir and Meissner, 2013; Kuemmerle, 1997; Simmie, 2003; Spithoven et…”
The impact of R&D offshoring on the home knowledge production of OECD investing regions (2012, background): “In particular, the RSI approach is based on the idea that regional borders (rather than national) better define the ways innovation is created by strongly interrelated local actors (Asheim, 1996; Braczyk, Cooke and Heidenreich, 1998; Cooke, 2005).”