FastTree: Computing Large Minimum Evolution Trees with Profiles instead of a Distance Matrix

By Morgan N. Price, Paramvir S. Dehal, Adam P. Arkin. Molecular biology and evolution, 2009

5,061 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Gene families are growing rapidly, but standard methods for inferring phylogenies do not scale to alignments with over 10,000 sequences. We present FastTree, a method for constructing large phylogenies and for estimating their reliability. Instead of storing a distance matrix, FastTree stores sequence profiles of internal nodes in the tree. FastTree uses these profiles to implement Neighbor-Joining and uses heuristics to quickly identify candidate joins. FastTree then uses nearest neighbor interchanges to reduce the length of the tree. For an alignment with N sequences, L sites, and a different characters, a distance matrix requires O(N2) space and O(N2L) time, but FastTree requires just O(NLa + N) memory and O(Nlog (N)La) time. To estimate the tree's reliability, FastTree uses local bootstrapping, which gives another 100-fold speedup over a distance matrix. For example, FastTree computed a tree and support values for 158,022 distinct 16S ribosomal RNAs in 17 h and 2.4 GB of memory. Just computing pairwise Jukes–Cantor distances and storing them, without inferring a tree or bootstrapping, would require 17 h and 50 GB of memory. In simulations, FastTree was slightly more accurate than Neighbor-Joining, BIONJ, or FastME; on genuine alignments, FastTree's topologies had higher likelihoods. FastTree is available at http://microbesonline.org/fasttree.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d054caaec9e59a15b30845f81d31dcf95594b87

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. Rob Knight
  2. Noah Fierer
  3. C. Lauber
  4. J. Gregory Caporaso
  5. Ruth E. Ley
  6. Antonio Gonzalez
  7. William Walters
  8. Curtis Huttenhower

In Plant Science

  1. Noah Fierer
  2. J. Rousk
  3. Rob Knight
  4. C. Lauber
  5. M. Bradford
  6. Olivier Gascuel
  7. Paramvir S. Dehal
  8. Adam P. Arkin

Citations in the corpus