Expanding credit access: Using randomized supply decisions to estimate the impacts

By Dean S. Karlan, Jonathan Zinman. 2006

928 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cfe73438eb3a5ecd04c3cdba0c9fd1ec79f6747

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Win Some Lose Some? Evidence from a Randomized Microcredit Program Placement Experiment by Compartamos Banco (2013, background): “…at lower interest rates by nonprofits (Banerjee et al. 2009; Crepon et al. 2011), or a for-profit bank (Attanasio et al. 2011), or individual liability loans (Karlan and Zinman 2010; Karlan and Zinman 2011; Augsburg et al. 2012) find somewhat positive but not transformational treatment effects.”
Financial inclusion and development : recent impact evidence (2014, background): “However, borrowers were also more subject to stress (Karlan and Zinman 2010).”
Systematic Review. What is the evidence of the impact of microfinance on the well-being of poor people? (2011, background): “35 Karlan and Zinman 2010 0.693 Karlan D, Zinman J (2010) Expanding Credit Access: Using randomised supply decisions to estimate the impacts.”
Funding Financial Inclusion: Institutional Logics and the Contextual Contingency of Funding for Microfinance Organizations (2016, background): “There is evidence that loans help the poor to absorb unforeseen expenses and foster a long-term orientation in their consumption decisions (Karlan & Zinman, 2010).”
Microcredit Under the Microscope: What Have We Learned in the Past Two Decades, and What Do We Need to Know? (2013, background): “In another early study, Karlan & Zinman (2010) look at a microloan product that is even more unlike classical microcredit—an individual loan in South Africa at 200%APR, given after a significant amount of screening.”
The Ecological Footprint of Poverty Alleviation: Evidence from Mexico's Oportunidades Program (2010, methodology): “Furthermore, the eligibility cutoff that we use for identification in this paper is close to the extensive margin of the actual program, and hence plausibly measures the impact of expanding the current program, as in Karlan and Zinman (2010).”