China's Innovation System Reform and Growing Industry and Science Linkages

By Kazuyuki Motohashi, X. Yun. 2007

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cafea388c2a6fcd35cb009fd447e2a7d13e9c22

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Innovation capacity and economic development: China and India (2011, background): “(Liu and White 2001; Katrak 2002; Kumar and Jain 2002; Fan 2006a; Fan and Watanabe 2006; Motohashi and Yun 2007).”
Impact of university intellectual property policy on the performance of university-industry research collaboration (2012, background): “…on Western (especially European) countries, while relatively few studies exist concerning UIC in Japan and Eastern Asia (Eom and Lee 2010; Hemmert et al. 2008; Motohashi 2005; Motohashi and Yun 2007; Okamuro et al. 2011), despite the recent growth of interest in and rapid development of UIC.”
National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: a critical review of the literature (2015, background): “…indigenous industries to global competition, and greater support for private enterprise and entrepreneurial activity; along with co-current policies toward the technological development, maturation, and the global orientation of indigenous industries (see Krishnan, 2003; Motohashi and Yun, 2007).”
R&D expenditures, ultimate ownership and future performance: Evidence from China (2017, background): “More than 30% of SOEs under investigation are active in outsourcing S&T activities to universities and public research institutes (Motohashi & Yun, 2007).”
Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: : The role of region-specific institutions (2015, background): “such capabilities rapidly due to time compression diseconomies (Motohashi and Yun, 2007; Perks et al., 2009).”
Exporting and innovating among emerging market firms: The moderating role of institutional development (2017, background): “These institutions provide resources to local knowledge contributors, while the major knowledge contributors – typically enterprises, public research institutes, universities, etc. – may vary from country to country (Kumaraswamy, Mudambi, Saranga & Tripathy, 2012; Motohashi & Yun, 2007).”
The territorial dynamics of innovation in China and India (2012, unknown): “As a consequence, Indian clusters may also reflect the organic clustering of MNEs and the role of regionally-specific transnational networks, which are market-led processes, as well as differences in the quality of education and infrastructure, that expose the more decentralized nature of India and ”