Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews
By Neal R Haddaway, P. Woodcock, Biljana Macura, A. Collins. Conservation Biology, 2015
366 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c161522a306913b19d0e3134584e67065e78cc2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- How just and just how? A systematic review of social equity in conservation research (2018, background): “Such an approach provides a transparent and repeatable methodology, and aims to reduce bias in our selection of the literature (Haddaway et al 2015).”
- African community-based conservation: a systematic review of social and ecological outcomes (2018, methodology): “Systematic reviews are becoming more common in environmental research (e.g., Berrang-Ford et al. 2015, Haddaway et al. 2015, Leisher et al. 2016, Fagerholm et al. 2016, McKinnon et al. 2016), and are an attempt to enhance replicability and transparency of research methods and reduce subjectivity in…”
- Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment (2021, background): “, 2008), biology (Haddaway et al., 2015; Pullin & Stewart, 2006), epidemiology (Kastner et al.”
- ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (2018, background): “We believe that ROSES will not only benefit the CEE community, but also those who wish to conduct a review in a systematic way but do not have the resources for a full systematic review or map [45].”
- Responsible genetic approach to stock restoration, sea ranching and stock enhancement of marine fishes and invertebrates (2017, background): “While this is not a systematic review (Haddaway et al. 2015), we have, nevertheless, attempted to 616 Rev Fish Biol Fisheries (2017) 27:615–649”
- The Way Forward in Mindfulness and Sustainability: a Critical Review and Research Agenda (2020, background): “This work is based on a traditional literature review which integrates several key principles of a systematic literature review, to improve objectivity and transparency and avoid biases in the selection of studies (Haddaway et al. 2015).”
- Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017, methodology): “For example, in a meta-analysis, one can run the regression analysis using quality scores as “weights”—this way, the higherquality work gets counted more heavily than the lower-quality work (Petticrew and Roberts 2006; Haddaway et al. 2015).”
- Cover Crop for Early Season Weed Suppression in Crops: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (2018, methodology): “Data extracted through a systematic review are summarized into single quantitative estimates or effect sizes by a statistical technique known as meta-analysis (Haddaway et al., 2015).”