Acculturation
By D. Sam, John W. Berry. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2010
1,031 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bfdcc2b1d9ffd41b72f2299084726a1e433df59
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Social Psychology
- Miles Hewstone
- R. Crisp
- Rupert Brown
- John F. Dovidio
- Hanna Zagefka
- Robert L. Engle
- Kerri Anne Crowne
- M. Gocłowska
In Sociology and Political Science
- Miles Hewstone
- R. Crisp
- Rupert Brown
- John F. Dovidio
- Hanna Zagefka
- Byron L. Zamboanga
- K. Luyckx
- Rhiannon N. Turner
Citations in the corpus
- Identity in Emerging Adulthood (2013, background): “Given that acculturation has been framed as an identity transformation (Sam & Berry, 2010) and that the allure of terrorist groups is often based on identities that they confer on their members (Post, 2005), the role of identity in these issues is essential to explore.”
- More Than the Sum of Its Parts: A Transformative Theory of Biculturalism (2017, background): “…affiliation strategy: Having both cultural affiliations is related to greater adjustment and well-being compared with having only one cultural affiliation (Berry, 2005; Berry et al., 2006; Chen, BenetMartínez, & Bond, 2008; Nguyen & Benet-Martínez, 2013 ; Sam & Berry, 2010; Torres & Rollock, 2009).”
- Included but Invisible? Subtle Bias, Common Identity, and the Darker Side of “We” (2016, neutral): “In his classic acculturation framework, Berry (1997, 2001; see also Sam & Berry, 2010) presents four forms of cultural relations in pluralistic societies that represent the intersection of “yes– no” responses to two relevant questions: (1) Are cultural identity and customs of value to be retained?”
- The impact of international experience on cultural intelligence: an application of contact theory in a structured short-term programme (2014, background): “Scholars believe that intercultural contact can result in psychological changes in individual’s daily behaviours (Sam and Berry 2010), thus likely raising one’s level of metacognitive CQ, cognitive CQ and behavioural CQ. Specifically, when put into the context of contact theory (Allport 1954)…”
- Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions (2017, background): “Currently, societies are changing rapidly following unprecedented levels of migration, and these changes involve complicated issues of social identity among members of immigrant groups and members of the host country (Sam & Berry, 2010).”
- Cultural differences in social networking site use: A comparative study of China and the United States (2013, background): “Another direction for future research is to examine the effects of acculturation on virtual behavior (Sam & Berry, 2010).”
- Living in a multicultural world: Intergroup ideologies and the societal context of intergroup relations (2014, background): “…strategies (i.e., integration [multiculturalism], assimilation, separation, and marginalisation) has similarly shown that, with few exceptions, immigrants display a preference for integration rather than assimilation (see Berry, 2005; Berry et al., 2006; Brown & Zagefka, 2011; Sam & Berry, 2010).”
- The Dynamics of Acculturation: An Intergroup Perspective (2011, background): “To our mind, this is particularly important because it gives us the first clues as to the possible antecedents of acculturation preferences, something the field has long lacked (Berry, 1997; Sam & Berry, 2010).”
- The Influence of Motivational Cultural Intelligence on Cultural Effectiveness Based on Study Abroad (2015, background): “Research may also examine the role of other relevant identity constructs such as biculturalism (see reviews by Nguyen & Benet-Martínez, 2007; Sam & Berry, 2010).”
- How Dual-Identity Processes Foster Creativity (2014, background): “…the more narrow sense, describes the process through which immigrants moving to a new country psychologically react to their new social reality—a reality in which they must resolve potential conflicts between their original cultural identity and their new identity (Berry, 1997; Sam & Berry, 2010).”