Using Bilingual Respondents to Evaluate Translated-Adapted Items
By S. Sireci, G. Berberoğlu. 2000
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ba5828a07b8e887e5489e868905f02eb468b489
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Reliability and Validity of a Spanish Version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (2006, methodology): “METHOD Systematic translation with adequacy checks is a critical step in preparing a reliable and valid instrument for use in a linguistically different population (Chang, Chau, & Holroyd, 1999; Maneesriwongul & Dixon, 2004; Sireci & Berbero-Glu, 2000; Yu, Lee, & Woo, 2004).”
- A Monte Carlo Comparison of Parametric and Nonparametric Polytomous DIF Detection Methods (2002, methodology): “The GRM has been a very popular model in studying DIF (see, e.g., Lorenz, Smith, Bolt, Schmitt, & Newman, 2000; Reise, Widaman, & Pugh, 1993; Sireci & Berberoglu, 2000; Thissen et al., 1986).”
- Lost in translation: methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. (2007, background): “the instruments and instructions are the same for both versions (Grisay, 2003; Sireci & Berberoglu, 2000 ).”